Get expert advice to help you get published!

You are here

Publications

Not only do we post informative resources on Editage Insights, but we publish papers elsewhere as well. This section lists our various publications on topics related to academic publishing and scientific communication.
Author perspectives on the academic publishing process
viewed
The Editage Insights team developed a large-scale survey entitled “Author perspectives on the academic publishing process” to understand the viewpoints of authors on various aspects of academic publishing and the challenges they face. Based on the interim results drawn from 5,293 survey responses, the paper Authors’ perspectives on academic publishing: initial observations from a large-scale global survey published in Science Editing presents some interesting and thought-provoking trends that...
Guest post in Scholarly Kitchen
viewed
We are witnessing a boom in science publications that is both exciting and concerning. Is this deluge in publications taking us closer to unravelling unsolved problems? Or is it leading to a situation where finding relevant literature is like finding needle in a haystack? The article titled Research deluge — are researchers writing more yet contributing less? published as a guest post in Scholarly Kitchen explores concerning aspects around the  exponential growth in the volume of publication in...
What causes peer review scams and how can they be prevented?
viewed
Peer review is regarded as one of the mainstays of academic publishing. It is conceivably the most trusted method to weed out invalid and suspicious research and improve the quality of published research. Therefore, journals across disciplines have adopted peer review as a core part of the publishing process to uphold academic standards of ethics, validity, and reliability.
How do authors feel when they receive negative peer reviewer comments? An experience from Chinese biomedical researchers
viewed
This study tries to understand what kind of reviewer comments authors, particularly non-native English speaking authors from China, perceive as negative; how they react to negative reviewer comments; and what, if any, long-term impact such comments have on the authors’ confidence and motivation levels. 
The Sunshine Act and medical publications
viewed
This article, published in Postgraduate Medicine, explores what type of information regarding authorship and pharmaceutical industry support has been provided to physicians by professional associations, and whether the information was consistent with other interpretations of the Sunshine Act.
viewed
In recent years, many journal editorial departments have begun to employ freelance editors rather than an exclusively in-house team. Although a freelance editing model offers greater editor availability and subject-area expertise, it necessitates betterquality control. We hypothesize that 
viewed
International journals solicit submissions from authors all over the world. But are these journals' author guidelines clear enough for nonnative English speakers? 
viewed
How can NNES authors be empowered in an era of globalization? This meeting report appearing in Science Editors is based on a session during the CSE 2013 meeting. Interesting case studies highlighted at this event emphasize the need for academic authors in non-native English-speaking (NNES) countries to receive English-language grounding.  
viewed
Editors have an important role in handling research misconduct. A session took place on the topic during the Council of Science Editors (CSE) Annual Meeting, May 2013, Montreal. Find out from this published meeting report the views and helpful resources shared by speakers of prominent organizations.
viewed
The essay is based on a presentation by the author at the 11th International Conference of EASE, Tallinn, June 2012. 

Pages