Get expert advice to help you get published!

You are here

Keeping the scholarly record sound - a journal editor's duty

Editage Insights | Jun 27, 2014 | 23,454 views
Dr. Irene Hames, Research-Publication & Peer-Review Specialist

Dr. Irene Hames is an independent research-publication and peer-review specialist with over 30 years' experience in scholarly publishing. Currently, Dr. Hames holds advisory roles with a number of organizations such as Sense About Science and the International Society of Managing and Technical Editors. She holds a PhD in cell biology, is a Fellow of the Society of Biology, and sits on the Society’s Research Dissemination Committee. (See her extended biographical summary in part one of the interview series.)

In the previous segments of our interview series, Dr. Hames discussed ethical issues in scholarly publication, the work of the Committee on Publication Ethicshow the journal editorial process has evolved over the years, and what the community can expect from peer review. In the last part of the series, she shares how journal editors should handle flaws with studies, how she and thousands of other scientists help promote a public understanding of science, and more.

When peer review fails to catch serious flaw with studies, how do journals typically handle matters internally? How rigorous and prompt is (or should be) the journal’s approach to address and improve their system and staff/reviewer practices?

We hope you've enjoyed reading this article so far
To continue reading, sign up and get complete access to a vibrant global community of researchers. Gain expertise & share your own with authors and others involved in scholarly publishing.
By clicking 'Join Now', you agree to our Terms & Privacy Policy.
Having trouble registering/logging in? Contact us
Free unlimited access
  • Premium content
  • Q&A Forum
  • Personalized reading library
  • Members-only discounts and much more

Testimonial