Get expert advice to help you get published!

You are here

DOAJ takes steps to keep predatory publishers at bay

Sneha Kulkarni | Aug 11, 2014 | 30,839 views
DOAJ takes steps to keep predatory publishers at bay

The Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), a website that lists open access journals, has announced that all the journals listed in their directory will need to reapply to ensure that they meet the newer and stricter criteria, Nature reported.

DOAJ, which was started in 2003 and now comprises over 10,000 journals, has been criticized for poor quality control. According to Walt Crawford, a retired library systems analyst in Livermore, California, the DOAJ currently includes around 900 titles that Jeffrey Beall, the librarian at the University of Colorado Denver, has included in a blacklist of potential predatory journals.

The managing director of the DOAJ, Lars Bjørnshauge, has taken steps to weed out potential predatory journals by asking all the listed journals to provide detailed information about the journal, their editorial process, digital archiving policy, and content licensing. The journals that pass the reapplication process will be given a 'seal' of best practice. Journals that wish to reapply will go through a two-layered check: associate editors will check the information submitted in reapplications with the publishers, and then a second round of check will be performed by managing editors.  

This reapplication process will likely make the DOAJ a useful tool for funders, researchers, and librarians since it will become one of the largest ‘whitelists’ of acceptable open-access journals. The chief strategy officer at open-access publishers Hindawi, Paul Peters, says “Scholarly researchers need a way to determine whether a given journal is adhering to best practice, and I believe that the DOAJ can provide a trusted and scalable mechanism for doing so.” However, it remains to be seen whether the DOAJ would be able to keep predatory publishers out of its index and become the trusted directory of open access journals.

Know more about emerging trends in bogus metrics and the future of open access and how fraud publishers are misusing the open access model to dupe authors in these video interviews with Jeffrey Beall.


Like this article? Republish it!
Knowledge should be open to all. We encourage our viewers to republish articles, online or in print. Our Creative Commons license allows you to do so for free. We only ask you to follow a few simple guidelines:
  • Attribution: Remember to attribute our authors. They spend a lot of time and effort in creating this content for you.
  • Editage Insights: Include an attribution to Editage Insights as the original source.
  • Consider a teaser: Yes, that’s what we call it…a teaser. You could include a few lines of this post and say “Read the whole article on Editage Insights”. Don’t forget to add the link to the article.
  • Re-using images: Re-publishing some of the images from our articles may need prior permission from or credit to the original image source.
  • Quick and easy embed code: The simplest way to share this article on your webpage would be to embed the code below.


Please copy the above code and embed it onto your website to republish.
Download free ebooks, guides and templates.
Editage Insights offers a wealth of free resources on academic research and publishing. Sign up and get complete access to a vibrant global community of 179k researchers.
By clicking 'Join Now', you agree to our Terms & Privacy Policy.
Having trouble registering/logging in? Contact us
Q & A

Have your own question?

Related Categories