
{"id":1024,"date":"2017-02-22T06:19:09","date_gmt":"2017-02-22T06:19:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different\/"},"modified":"2025-02-19T12:07:04","modified_gmt":"2025-02-19T12:07:04","slug":"if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;If it is correct, economics would be different&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">\u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/news\/economics-brief\/21702428-george-akerlofs-1970-paper-market-lemons-foundation-stone-information\">If this is correct, economics would be different<\/a>.\u201d With these words, the editor of the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scimagojr.com\/journalsearch.php?q=24404&amp;tip=sid&amp;clean=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Journal of Political Economy<\/em><\/a>\u00a0(circa 1970) began a letter of rejection\u00a0addressed to\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/George_Akerlof\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">George Akerlof<\/a>. As a freshly minted PhD from MIT, Akerlof was quickly coming to terms with the realities of academic publishing. His paper titled &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Market_for_Lemons\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Market for Lemons<\/a>&#8221; had been previously rejected by the two other leading economic journals\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scimagojr.com\/journalsearch.php?q=22697&amp;tip=sid&amp;clean=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>American Economic Review<\/em>\u00a0<\/a>and\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scimagojr.com\/journalsearch.php?q=24202&amp;tip=sid&amp;clean=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Review of Economic Studies<\/em><\/a>,\u00a0the consensus view being that the paper&#8217;s insights were &#8216;trivial&#8217;.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">To those of us who toil in the trenches of academic publishing, such feedback (and often worse) is the coin of the realm. However, Akerlof graciously concedes that the referees were correct; after all, he was discussing the mundane tediousness of used-car sales. The paper was eventually published in the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.scimagojr.com\/journalsearch.php?q=29431&amp;tip=sid&amp;clean=0\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>Quarterly Journal of Economics<\/em>\u00a0<\/a>and its simplistic notion that some market participants know more than others (information asymmetry) helped the author win the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nobelprize.org\/nobel_prizes\/economic-sciences\/laureates\/2001\/press.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">2001 Economics Nobel<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Tempting as it may be, we must refrain from using this anecdote as a stick with which to beat the peer-review based system of journal publication. The gatekeepers to the promised land of publication success can definitely be nitpicky but we need them guarding those proverbial walls. However, Akerlof&#8217;s trials serve as a reminder that one should develop a thick skin when it comes to negative\/critical feedback and accord due honor to perceived personal failure.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Recommended reading:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-journal-rejections-sometimes-work-to-your-advantage\/\">Can journal rejections sometimes work to your advantage?<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/turning-manuscript-rejection-into-a-positive-experience\">Turning manuscript rejection into a positive experience<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/should-i-throw-away-my-rejected-manuscript\/\">Should I throw away my rejected manuscript?<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cIf this is correct, economics would be different.\u201d With these words, the editor of the\u00a0Journal of Political Economy\u00a0(circa 1970) began a letter of rejection\u00a0addressed to\u00a0George Akerlof. As a freshly minted PhD from MIT, Akerlof was quickly coming to terms with the realities of academic publishing. His paper titled &#8220;The Market for Lemons&#8221; had been previously [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":19,"featured_media":33313,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2405],"tags":[539],"new_categories":[],"new_tags":[],"series":[],"class_list":["post-1024","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry-trends","tag-peer-review-process"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>&quot;If it is correct, economics would be different&quot; | Editage Insights<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rejection is part of academic publishing, and it is by no means an indication of the quality of study or the researcher&#039;s worth. This post discusses an anecdote involving Nobel Laureate George Akerlof - how his rejected paper led him to win the most recognized prize in science.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"&quot;If it is correct, economics would be different&quot; | Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rejection is part of academic publishing, and it is by no means an indication of the quality of study or the researcher&#039;s worth. This post discusses an anecdote involving Nobel Laureate George Akerlof - how his rejected paper led him to win the most recognized prize in science.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-02-22T06:19:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-02-19T12:07:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/If-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different-original.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"656\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"437\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Nitin Nair\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Nitin Nair\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Nitin Nair\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/e9c408d2741ed99e1bb18ff137b3ca15\"},\"headline\":\"&#8220;If it is correct, economics would be different&#8221;\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-22T06:19:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-19T12:07:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different\"},\"wordCount\":269,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"peer review process\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Industry Trends\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different\",\"name\":\"\\\"If it is correct, economics would be different\\\" | Editage Insights\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-02-22T06:19:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-19T12:07:04+00:00\",\"description\":\"Rejection is part of academic publishing, and it is by no means an indication of the quality of study or the researcher's worth. This post discusses an anecdote involving Nobel Laureate George Akerlof - how his rejected paper led him to win the most recognized prize in science.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"width\":656,\"height\":336},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"&#8220;If it is correct, economics would be different&#8221;\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":324,\"caption\":\"Editage Insights\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Editage\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/e9c408d2741ed99e1bb18ff137b3ca15\",\"name\":\"Nitin Nair\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ff0f14df25aedbc01d1d3bae2edc32461674b95252c0ca6c7b8de11d7bc5c8c2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ff0f14df25aedbc01d1d3bae2edc32461674b95252c0ca6c7b8de11d7bc5c8c2?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Nitin Nair\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/nitin-nair\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\"If it is correct, economics would be different\" | Editage Insights","description":"Rejection is part of academic publishing, and it is by no means an indication of the quality of study or the researcher's worth. This post discusses an anecdote involving Nobel Laureate George Akerlof - how his rejected paper led him to win the most recognized prize in science.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\"If it is correct, economics would be different\" | Editage Insights","og_description":"Rejection is part of academic publishing, and it is by no means an indication of the quality of study or the researcher's worth. This post discusses an anecdote involving Nobel Laureate George Akerlof - how his rejected paper led him to win the most recognized prize in science.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different","og_site_name":"Editage Insights","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","article_published_time":"2017-02-22T06:19:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-02-19T12:07:04+00:00","og_image":[{"width":656,"height":437,"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/If-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different-original.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Nitin Nair","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Editage","twitter_site":"@Editage","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Nitin Nair","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different"},"author":{"name":"Nitin Nair","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/e9c408d2741ed99e1bb18ff137b3ca15"},"headline":"&#8220;If it is correct, economics would be different&#8221;","datePublished":"2017-02-22T06:19:09+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-19T12:07:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different"},"wordCount":269,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","keywords":["peer review process"],"articleSection":["Industry Trends"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different","name":"\"If it is correct, economics would be different\" | Editage Insights","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","datePublished":"2017-02-22T06:19:09+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-19T12:07:04+00:00","description":"Rejection is part of academic publishing, and it is by no means an indication of the quality of study or the researcher's worth. This post discusses an anecdote involving Nobel Laureate George Akerlof - how his rejected paper led him to win the most recognized prize in science.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","width":656,"height":336},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/if-it-is-correct-economics-would-be-different#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"&#8220;If it is correct, economics would be different&#8221;"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","name":"Editage Insights","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization","name":"Editage Insights","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":324,"caption":"Editage Insights"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","https:\/\/x.com\/Editage"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/e9c408d2741ed99e1bb18ff137b3ca15","name":"Nitin Nair","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ff0f14df25aedbc01d1d3bae2edc32461674b95252c0ca6c7b8de11d7bc5c8c2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ff0f14df25aedbc01d1d3bae2edc32461674b95252c0ca6c7b8de11d7bc5c8c2?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Nitin Nair"},"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/nitin-nair"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1024","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/19"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1024"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1024\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1024"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1024"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1024"},{"taxonomy":"new_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_categories?post=1024"},{"taxonomy":"new_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_tags?post=1024"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=1024"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}