{"id":1179,"date":"2015-03-03T16:11:42","date_gmt":"2015-03-03T16:11:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science\/"},"modified":"2026-03-22T11:08:17","modified_gmt":"2026-03-22T05:38:17","slug":"open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science","title":{"rendered":"Open peer review: A step towards open science?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\">Open science is zealously propagated by academicians in a bid to make scientific data and research widely accessible to the public. Apart from the need for researchers to share their data and make their research open access, wouldn\u2019t it be in line with the open science movement to make peer review open? \u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\">Scientific peer review, one of the mainstays of scientific publication, has been adopted by journals as a means of validating the accuracy of research before it reaches publication. Although peer review is considered effective in weeding out bad science, it is not a flawless system. Most journals opt for single-blind peer review, and this skewed balance of information can be a cause of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/publication-and-reporting-biases-and-how-they-impact-publication-of-research\">publication bias<\/a> and other issues such as the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified\">reviewers&#8217;\u00a0demand for additional experiments that are often unnecessary<\/a>. To lend transparency to the peer review process and increase its impact and outreach, Michael Markie, an associate publisher for <em>F1000 Research<\/em>, has proposed an \u2018oath\u2019 for peer reviewers in a paper titled <a href=\"http:\/\/f1000research.com\/articles\/3-271\/v2\">An Open Science Peer Review Oath<\/a>.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\">The oath proposed by the authors of the paper comprises a set of statements that \u201ccodify the role of reviewers, encouraging and promoting best practices to ensure that the science they review is as open and reproducible as possible.\u201d The oath is a declaration that reviewers ought to make before they begin with their review, and reads thus:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><strong><em>Principle 1<\/em><\/strong><em>: I will sign my name to my review<\/em><\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><strong><em>Principle 2<\/em><\/strong><em>: I will review with integrity<\/em><\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><strong><em>Principle 3<\/em><\/strong><em>: I will treat the review as a discourse with you; in particular, I will provide constructive criticism<\/em><\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\"><strong><em>Principle 4<\/em><\/strong><em>: I will be an ambassador for the practice of open science <\/em><\/span><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px; font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif;\">The oath framed by the authors is an outcome of guidelines they have drawn for open science reviewers that ensure authors a fair and constructive review, such as:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\">I will work with you to help improve your research, as I believe that peer review should be an open, supportive, and collaborative process. I will, therefore, sign my review and state my identity.<\/span><\/span><\/em><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\">I will check that any data and software code are consistent with the text, that any digital object identifiers and accession numbers are correct and correctly cited, and that any models presented are archived, referenced, and accessible.<\/span><\/span><\/em><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\">I will decline to review if I am not an appropriate reviewer (whether because of my expertise or because of my relationship with the author(s)). In doing so, I will provide journal editors with an honest appraisal of these issues, and will openly explain how I reached my decision so that alternative reviewers may be found.<\/span><\/span><\/em><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\">Since there is an absence of formal peer review training in most institutions and learned societies, it is usually a reviewer\u2019s experience and subject matter expertise that helps him or her perform a review. Thus, Markie and the other authors of this paper wish to provide generalized guideposts for reviewers that can be tailored by journals to suit their processes. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/news\/science-and-technology\/21642363-quality-control-process-science-publishing-evolving-code-ethics-hot-pursuit-oath\">Open peer review has already found support<\/a> in Pensoft Publishers and the Journal of Open Research Software who have adopted the practice.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\">An often cited criticism against open peer review is that reviewers might hesitate to be too critical of a paper to preserve a long-term relationship with the author(s). Apart from this, the recent times have witnessed <a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/post-publication-peer-review-and-legal-clashes-should-researchers-be-wary-of-commenting-publicly\/\">authors filing defamation suits against peers<\/a> who have questioned the validity of their research. To avoid any legal clashes, reviewers may be gentle in their review since it would be publicly accessible. Marcia McNutt, editor-in-chief of\u00a0<em>Science<\/em>, shares this view and remarks, \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/www.economist.com\/news\/science-and-technology\/21642363-quality-control-process-science-publishing-evolving-code-ethics-hot-pursuit-oath\">inadequate criticism might do more of a disservice to science than the bruised sensibilities from closed reviews.<\/a>\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\">While some journals are working towards making peer review open and transparent, others have taken an opposite stance; recently, <em>Nature<\/em> introduced the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/nature-journals-to-allow-authors-to-opt-for-double-blind-peer-review\/\">option for authors to select double-blind peer review<\/a>. Peer review has been subjected to various experiments over the years by academicians who are looking for a perfect formula to validate research findings effectively. Although traditional peer review still holds strong, open peer review seems to hold promise to make science more open and accessible to all.\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><script type=\"text\/javascript\" charset=\"utf-8\" src=\"http:\/\/static.polldaddy.com\/p\/8802005.js\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p><noscript>&amp;lt;a href=&#8221;<a href=\"http:\/\/polldaddy.com\/poll\/8802005\/\">http:\/\/polldaddy.com\/poll\/8802005\/<\/a>&#8220;&amp;gt;Do you think open peer review is the right way forward?&amp;lt;\/a&amp;gt;<\/noscript><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Open science is zealously propagated by academicians in a bid to make scientific data and research widely accessible to the public. Apart from the need for researchers to share their data and make their research open access, wouldn\u2019t it be in line with the open science movement to make peer review open? \u00a0 Scientific peer [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":45764,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2405],"tags":[227,539],"new_categories":[],"new_tags":[],"series":[],"class_list":["post-1179","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry-trends","tag-open-science","tag-peer-review-process"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Open peer review: A step towards open science? | Editage Insights<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Open science is zealously propagated by academicians in a bid to make scientific data and research widely accessible to the public. Apart from the need for researchers to share their data and make their research open access, wouldn\u2019t it be in line with the open science movement to make peer review open?\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Open peer review: A step towards open science? | Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Open science is zealously propagated by academicians in a bid to make scientific data and research widely accessible to the public. Apart from the need for researchers to share their data and make their research open access, wouldn\u2019t it be in line with the open science movement to make peer review open?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-03-03T16:11:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-03-22T05:38:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/97d55758-8413-42a8-a13e-2cd310359a85.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"768\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sneha Kulkarni\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sneha Kulkarni\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sneha Kulkarni\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d\"},\"headline\":\"Open peer review: A step towards open science?\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-03-03T16:11:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-22T05:38:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science\"},\"wordCount\":722,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/97d55758-8413-42a8-a13e-2cd310359a85.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"open science\",\"peer review process\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Industry Trends\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science\",\"name\":\"Open peer review: A step towards open science? | Editage Insights\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/97d55758-8413-42a8-a13e-2cd310359a85.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-03-03T16:11:42+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-03-22T05:38:17+00:00\",\"description\":\"Open science is zealously propagated by academicians in a bid to make scientific data and research widely accessible to the public. Apart from the need for researchers to share their data and make their research open access, wouldn\u2019t it be in line with the open science movement to make peer review open?\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/97d55758-8413-42a8-a13e-2cd310359a85.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/97d55758-8413-42a8-a13e-2cd310359a85.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":768},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Open peer review: A step towards open science?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":324,\"caption\":\"Editage Insights\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Editage\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d\",\"name\":\"Sneha Kulkarni\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sneha Kulkarni\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/sneha-kulkarni\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Open peer review: A step towards open science? | Editage Insights","description":"Open science is zealously propagated by academicians in a bid to make scientific data and research widely accessible to the public. Apart from the need for researchers to share their data and make their research open access, wouldn\u2019t it be in line with the open science movement to make peer review open?","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Open peer review: A step towards open science? | Editage Insights","og_description":"Open science is zealously propagated by academicians in a bid to make scientific data and research widely accessible to the public. Apart from the need for researchers to share their data and make their research open access, wouldn\u2019t it be in line with the open science movement to make peer review open?","og_url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science","og_site_name":"Editage Insights","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","article_published_time":"2015-03-03T16:11:42+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-03-22T05:38:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":768,"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/97d55758-8413-42a8-a13e-2cd310359a85.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sneha Kulkarni","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Editage","twitter_site":"@Editage","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sneha Kulkarni","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science"},"author":{"name":"Sneha Kulkarni","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d"},"headline":"Open peer review: A step towards open science?","datePublished":"2015-03-03T16:11:42+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-22T05:38:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science"},"wordCount":722,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/97d55758-8413-42a8-a13e-2cd310359a85.jpg","keywords":["open science","peer review process"],"articleSection":["Industry Trends"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science","name":"Open peer review: A step towards open science? | Editage Insights","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/97d55758-8413-42a8-a13e-2cd310359a85.jpg","datePublished":"2015-03-03T16:11:42+00:00","dateModified":"2026-03-22T05:38:17+00:00","description":"Open science is zealously propagated by academicians in a bid to make scientific data and research widely accessible to the public. Apart from the need for researchers to share their data and make their research open access, wouldn\u2019t it be in line with the open science movement to make peer review open?","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/97d55758-8413-42a8-a13e-2cd310359a85.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/97d55758-8413-42a8-a13e-2cd310359a85.jpg","width":512,"height":768},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/open-peer-review-a-step-towards-open-science#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Open peer review: A step towards open science?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","name":"Editage Insights","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization","name":"Editage Insights","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":324,"caption":"Editage Insights"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","https:\/\/x.com\/Editage"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d","name":"Sneha Kulkarni","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sneha Kulkarni"},"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/sneha-kulkarni"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1179","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1179"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1179\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":45767,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1179\/revisions\/45767"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/45764"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1179"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1179"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1179"},{"taxonomy":"new_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_categories?post=1179"},{"taxonomy":"new_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_tags?post=1179"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=1179"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}