{"id":1269,"date":"2016-03-25T17:21:22","date_gmt":"2016-03-25T17:21:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science\/"},"modified":"2025-02-17T12:50:11","modified_gmt":"2025-02-17T12:50:11","slug":"can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science","title":{"rendered":"Can scientific inquiry harm science?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\">With transparency and reproducibility coming under the spotlight, we frequently encounter statements such as \u201cScience is broken\u201d and \u201cScience needs to be fixed.\u201d Therefore, to ensure the credibility and integrity of published research, various initiatives have been undertaken to channelize scientific inquiry, such as data sharing, post-publication peer review, and critical review. Science is constantly evolving, so questioning the established and correcting the scientific record, are is vital. Elaborating on the importance of scientific inquiry, Robert May, Professor of Zoology, University of Oxford, says, \u201c<a href=\"http:\/\/rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org\/content\/369\/1956\/4685\">Science is better seen as organized scepticism: a journey, over time, toward contingent understanding guided by experimental tests and sceptical questioning<\/a>.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\">But can the questioning of published research, in fact, affect science?<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\">In <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/research-integrity-don-t-let-transparency-damage-science-1.19219\">Research integrity: Don&#8217;t let transparency damage science<\/a>, an article published recently in <em>Nature<\/em>, Dorothy Bishop and Stephan Lewandowsky attempt to distinguish \u201cscrutiny from harassment.\u201d According to them, some researchers are faced with \u201cendless information requests, complaints to researchers&#8217; universities, online harassment, distortion of scientific findings and even threats of violence,\u201d and responding to such undue demands for transparency can take researchers away from their primary focus. While the duo agree that openness is crucial, they believe that both researchers and the institutions they are affiliated to should be able to distinguish healthy debate from \u201ccampaigns that masquerade as scientific inquiry.\u201d To throw light on the ways in which researchers are harassed in the guise of legitimate scientific inquiry, they have listed five \u2018double-edged\u2019 tools, namely: call for data, social media posts, freedom of information requests, calls for retraction, and complaints to universities. The ways in which researchers should deal with such situations and how the research community should protect them form a part of their discussion. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\">According to Bishop and Lewondowsky, data requests are one of the ways in which researchers are attacked. Critics ask for data with the intent of \u201cfinding an analysis method that makes undesirable results go away,\u201d or creating \u201cthe false impression that data are being withheld.\u201d Further, the authors justify the hesitation of researchers who are asked to share their data when they are unsure of the intent of requesters for they may \u201ccherry-pick data to discredit reasonable conclusions.\u201d This view has met with heavy criticism from many researchers.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\">Nicole Janz, a political scientist at the Department of Sociology at the University of Cambridge, thinks the perspective of Bishop and Lewondowsky is as extreme as the one expressed in <em>New England Journal of Medicine<\/em>\u2019s editorial: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMe1516564\">\u201cThere is concern among some front-line researchers that the system will be taken over by what some researchers have characterized as \u201cresearch parasites.\u201d\u201d<\/a> She questions if all researchers who request for data to replicate a study should by default be considered as critics and fault finders, and whether they would need to prove that they do not intend to harass the researcher. Seconding this view, Judith Curry, professor and co-owner of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cfanclimate.com\/\">Climate Forecast Applications Network (CFAN)<\/a>, cites the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.collier.sts.vt.edu\/5424\/pdfs\/merton_1973.pdf\">Mertonian Norms of Science<\/a> that\u00a0represent principles that should be the basis of good scientific research. According to her, Bishop and Lewandowsky\u2019s views counter Merton\u2019s norms of communalism (having equal access to scientific goods), universalism, disinterestedness (acting for the benefit of a common scientific enterprise, rather than for personal gain), and organized skepticism (exposing scientific claims to critical scrutiny before being accepted). Curry opines that a researcher should be transparent about his\/her research and consider any requests for data or expressed criticism as part of being a researcher.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\">While it may be true that some researchers face untoward requests for information, data, institutional action, or retraction from fellow researchers, it would indeed be difficult to investigate whether the requesters or critics have any covert intentions at heart. It is a tightrope walk between maintaining transparency and protecting academicians from undue criticism and backlash. If scientific publications are to be considered as \u201cliving documents,\u201d researchers have to make their data public and address the criticism against their work. While the red flags may serve as good guidelines, science is complex and it may not always be possible to decide who is on the wrong side \u2013 the researcher or the critic.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\">Please share your views on this issue which has roused much interest among academics. Do you think researchers need protection from their institutions? Should researchers be wary of requests for data? How would you distinguish a professional request from personal agenda of malice? Make your opinion count by sharing it in the comments section below. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\">Related reading:<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/irreproducibility-the-soft-underbelly-of-science\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\">Irreproducibility: The soft underbelly of science\u00a0<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With transparency and reproducibility coming under the spotlight, we frequently encounter statements such as \u201cScience is broken\u201d and \u201cScience needs to be fixed.\u201d Therefore, to ensure the credibility and integrity of published research, various initiatives have been undertaken to channelize scientific inquiry, such as data sharing, post-publication peer review, and critical review. Science is constantly [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":33313,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2405],"tags":[498,227],"new_categories":[],"new_tags":[],"series":[],"class_list":["post-1269","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry-trends","tag-global-trends","tag-open-science"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Can scientific inquiry harm science? | Editage Insights<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Transparency and reproducibility have come under the spotlight. Therefore, to ensure the credibility and integrity of published research, various initiatives have been undertaken to channelize scientific inquiry. But can the questioning of published research, in fact, affect science? This post explores different views on this issue and tries to establish whether researchers should be wary of requests for data.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Can scientific inquiry harm science? | Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Transparency and reproducibility have come under the spotlight. Therefore, to ensure the credibility and integrity of published research, various initiatives have been undertaken to channelize scientific inquiry. But can the questioning of published research, in fact, affect science? This post explores different views on this issue and tries to establish whether researchers should be wary of requests for data.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-03-25T17:21:22+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-02-17T12:50:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/Sci-Hub-The-ongoing-debate-over-piracy-versus-universal-access-to-research-resized_0.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"656\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"336\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sneha Kulkarni\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sneha Kulkarni\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sneha Kulkarni\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d\"},\"headline\":\"Can scientific inquiry harm science?\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-03-25T17:21:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-17T12:50:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science\"},\"wordCount\":757,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"global trends\",\"open science\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Industry Trends\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science\",\"name\":\"Can scientific inquiry harm science? | Editage Insights\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-03-25T17:21:22+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-17T12:50:11+00:00\",\"description\":\"Transparency and reproducibility have come under the spotlight. Therefore, to ensure the credibility and integrity of published research, various initiatives have been undertaken to channelize scientific inquiry. But can the questioning of published research, in fact, affect science? This post explores different views on this issue and tries to establish whether researchers should be wary of requests for data.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"width\":656,\"height\":336},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Can scientific inquiry harm science?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":324,\"caption\":\"Editage Insights\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Editage\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d\",\"name\":\"Sneha Kulkarni\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sneha Kulkarni\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/sneha-kulkarni\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Can scientific inquiry harm science? | Editage Insights","description":"Transparency and reproducibility have come under the spotlight. Therefore, to ensure the credibility and integrity of published research, various initiatives have been undertaken to channelize scientific inquiry. But can the questioning of published research, in fact, affect science? This post explores different views on this issue and tries to establish whether researchers should be wary of requests for data.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Can scientific inquiry harm science? | Editage Insights","og_description":"Transparency and reproducibility have come under the spotlight. Therefore, to ensure the credibility and integrity of published research, various initiatives have been undertaken to channelize scientific inquiry. But can the questioning of published research, in fact, affect science? This post explores different views on this issue and tries to establish whether researchers should be wary of requests for data.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science","og_site_name":"Editage Insights","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","article_published_time":"2016-03-25T17:21:22+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-02-17T12:50:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":656,"height":336,"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/Sci-Hub-The-ongoing-debate-over-piracy-versus-universal-access-to-research-resized_0.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sneha Kulkarni","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Editage","twitter_site":"@Editage","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sneha Kulkarni","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science"},"author":{"name":"Sneha Kulkarni","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d"},"headline":"Can scientific inquiry harm science?","datePublished":"2016-03-25T17:21:22+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-17T12:50:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science"},"wordCount":757,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","keywords":["global trends","open science"],"articleSection":["Industry Trends"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science","name":"Can scientific inquiry harm science? | Editage Insights","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","datePublished":"2016-03-25T17:21:22+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-17T12:50:11+00:00","description":"Transparency and reproducibility have come under the spotlight. Therefore, to ensure the credibility and integrity of published research, various initiatives have been undertaken to channelize scientific inquiry. But can the questioning of published research, in fact, affect science? This post explores different views on this issue and tries to establish whether researchers should be wary of requests for data.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","width":656,"height":336},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-scientific-inquiry-harm-science#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Can scientific inquiry harm science?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","name":"Editage Insights","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization","name":"Editage Insights","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":324,"caption":"Editage Insights"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","https:\/\/x.com\/Editage"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d","name":"Sneha Kulkarni","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sneha Kulkarni"},"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/sneha-kulkarni"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1269","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1269"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1269\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1269"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1269"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1269"},{"taxonomy":"new_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_categories?post=1269"},{"taxonomy":"new_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_tags?post=1269"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=1269"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}