{"id":1390,"date":"2014-10-31T13:55:57","date_gmt":"2014-10-31T13:55:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified\/"},"modified":"2025-04-05T05:39:40","modified_gmt":"2025-04-05T05:39:40","slug":"is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified","title":{"rendered":"Is reviewers&#8217; demand for more experiments justified?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\">Technology has accelerated the pace of science significantly. However, <a href=\"http:\/\/vosshall.rockefeller.edu\/reprints\/3589.full.pdf\">the pace at which papers are published has decreased<\/a> over the decades. It takes several months to years for a researcher to publish a paper. One of the frequently cited reasons for the delay is peer reviewers\u2019 demand for additional experimentation. Although such requests are reasonable since reviewers aim to ensure that authors\u2019 claims are supported by evidence, often, this keeps good science from getting published sooner.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px; font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif;\">In most fields of science, authors are commonly asked by reviewers to perform further experiments. Solomon Snyder, a renowned neuropharmacologist, points out that <\/span><a style=\"font-size: 14px; font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif;\" href=\"http:\/\/www.pnas.org\/content\/110\/7\/2428.full.pdf#page=1&amp;view=FitH\">the journal review process has become prolonged due to such demands for exhaustive experimentation and documentation<\/a><span style=\"font-size: 14px; font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif;\">. This practice discourages researchers from publishing their best ideas since gathering additional data involves added cost and time. Dr. Snyder says that at times, researchers preemptively conduct experiments anticipating reviewers\u2019 suggestions, which can further postpone the paper\u2019s publication. Researchers are under great pressure to get published and conducting reviewer-suggested experiments can have an adverse impact on researchers\u2019 careers as well as prevent good research from reaching the public eye.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\">Dr. Hidde Ploegh, a professor of biology at the Whitehead Institute at Massachusetts Institute of Technology comments in his article &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nature.com\/news\/2011\/110427\/full\/472391a.html?WT.ec_id=NATURE-20110428\">End the wasteful tyranny of reviewer experiments<\/a>&#8221; that rather than reviewing the experimental data, referees often design and demand experiments that do not have a dramatic impact on the conclusions. He calls such experiments \u201creviewer experiments\u201d and notes that higher impact journals seem to demand more experiments; possibly, the referees feel they need to do this to raise the journal\u2019s standard. At times, reviewers suggest experiments that go beyond the scope of the submitted research. As a result, researchers may end up conducting experiments that could have been better studied in a follow-up paper. Dr. Ploegh also states that such practices increase costs for labs without offering any significant advantage for science.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\">For academic scientists, publication is the way to career advancement. When manuscripts are stuck in multiple rounds of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/what-is-peer-review-the-basics-and-guidelines-for-authors\">peer review<\/a>, young researchers in particular are the worst affected since the demand of additional work increases the time it takes to get published and established in their respective field. A possible solution to this problem is that journals should ask their reviewers to only highlight any gaps or flaws in the experiments. If more experiments are needed, they should provide logical reasons for their suggestions.\u00a0<\/span><\/span><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;\">After all, peer reviewers themselves are researchers, so they should be sensitive towards authors\u2019 interests.\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 14px; font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif;\">Journal editors can also play a major role by screening reviewers\u2019 suggestions for experimentation and ensuring that they are justified.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><span style=\"font-size: 14px;\">Science is a dynamic field of study; and the best way of advancing scientific knowledge is sharing novel ideas and theories with fellow researchers as quickly as possible. Therefore, journals should ensure that peer review is conducted responsibly and that it encourages swift publication of good research while minimizing the costs for the scientific community.\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;\">Many of you reading this article are authors and peer reviewers. It would be interesting to know your points of view on this issue.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;\">To know how journal editorial process has evolved over the years and what the community can expect from peer review, read this interview with Dr. Irene Hames, a research-publication and peer-review specialist &#8211; <a href=\"http:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/the-peer-review-process-challenges-and-progress\">The peer review process: challenges and progress<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Technology has accelerated the pace of science significantly. However, the pace at which papers are published has decreased over the decades. It takes several months to years for a researcher to publish a paper. One of the frequently cited reasons for the delay is peer reviewers\u2019 demand for additional experimentation. Although such requests are reasonable [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":33313,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2405],"tags":[1375,539],"new_categories":[],"new_tags":[],"series":[],"class_list":["post-1390","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry-trends","tag-peer-review-bias","tag-peer-review-process"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Is reviewers&#039; demand for more experiments justified? | Editage Insights<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"It takes several months to years for a researcher to publish a paper. A commonly cited reason for delayed publication is that the peer reviewers often recommend that additional experiments be performed. While reviewer-suggested experiments might be intended to ensure that authors\u2019 claims are supported by substantial evidence, such requests lead to a prolonged peer review process. This not only keeps good science away from the public but also increases the cost of labs since additional experiments need to be conducted. Do reviewer-suggested experiments really help in improving the research data or are the suggestions made indiscriminately? Can journal editors play a role in ensuring that peer review is conducted responsibly? Read the article that discusses these issues in depth.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Is reviewers&#039; demand for more experiments justified? | Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"It takes several months to years for a researcher to publish a paper. A commonly cited reason for delayed publication is that the peer reviewers often recommend that additional experiments be performed. While reviewer-suggested experiments might be intended to ensure that authors\u2019 claims are supported by substantial evidence, such requests lead to a prolonged peer review process. This not only keeps good science away from the public but also increases the cost of labs since additional experiments need to be conducted. Do reviewer-suggested experiments really help in improving the research data or are the suggestions made indiscriminately? Can journal editors play a role in ensuring that peer review is conducted responsibly? Read the article that discusses these issues in depth.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2014-10-31T13:55:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-05T05:39:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/Is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"656\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"336\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sneha Kulkarni\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sneha Kulkarni\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sneha Kulkarni\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d\"},\"headline\":\"Is reviewers&#8217; demand for more experiments justified?\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-10-31T13:55:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-05T05:39:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified\"},\"wordCount\":563,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"peer review bias\",\"peer review process\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Industry Trends\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified\",\"name\":\"Is reviewers' demand for more experiments justified? | Editage Insights\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2014-10-31T13:55:57+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-05T05:39:40+00:00\",\"description\":\"It takes several months to years for a researcher to publish a paper. A commonly cited reason for delayed publication is that the peer reviewers often recommend that additional experiments be performed. While reviewer-suggested experiments might be intended to ensure that authors\u2019 claims are supported by substantial evidence, such requests lead to a prolonged peer review process. This not only keeps good science away from the public but also increases the cost of labs since additional experiments need to be conducted. Do reviewer-suggested experiments really help in improving the research data or are the suggestions made indiscriminately? Can journal editors play a role in ensuring that peer review is conducted responsibly? Read the article that discusses these issues in depth.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"width\":656,\"height\":336},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Is reviewers&#8217; demand for more experiments justified?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":324,\"caption\":\"Editage Insights\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Editage\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d\",\"name\":\"Sneha Kulkarni\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sneha Kulkarni\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/sneha-kulkarni\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Is reviewers' demand for more experiments justified? | Editage Insights","description":"It takes several months to years for a researcher to publish a paper. A commonly cited reason for delayed publication is that the peer reviewers often recommend that additional experiments be performed. While reviewer-suggested experiments might be intended to ensure that authors\u2019 claims are supported by substantial evidence, such requests lead to a prolonged peer review process. This not only keeps good science away from the public but also increases the cost of labs since additional experiments need to be conducted. Do reviewer-suggested experiments really help in improving the research data or are the suggestions made indiscriminately? Can journal editors play a role in ensuring that peer review is conducted responsibly? Read the article that discusses these issues in depth.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Is reviewers' demand for more experiments justified? | Editage Insights","og_description":"It takes several months to years for a researcher to publish a paper. A commonly cited reason for delayed publication is that the peer reviewers often recommend that additional experiments be performed. While reviewer-suggested experiments might be intended to ensure that authors\u2019 claims are supported by substantial evidence, such requests lead to a prolonged peer review process. This not only keeps good science away from the public but also increases the cost of labs since additional experiments need to be conducted. Do reviewer-suggested experiments really help in improving the research data or are the suggestions made indiscriminately? Can journal editors play a role in ensuring that peer review is conducted responsibly? Read the article that discusses these issues in depth.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified","og_site_name":"Editage Insights","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","article_published_time":"2014-10-31T13:55:57+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-05T05:39:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":656,"height":336,"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/10\/Is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sneha Kulkarni","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Editage","twitter_site":"@Editage","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sneha Kulkarni","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified"},"author":{"name":"Sneha Kulkarni","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d"},"headline":"Is reviewers&#8217; demand for more experiments justified?","datePublished":"2014-10-31T13:55:57+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-05T05:39:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified"},"wordCount":563,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","keywords":["peer review bias","peer review process"],"articleSection":["Industry Trends"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified","name":"Is reviewers' demand for more experiments justified? | Editage Insights","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","datePublished":"2014-10-31T13:55:57+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-05T05:39:40+00:00","description":"It takes several months to years for a researcher to publish a paper. A commonly cited reason for delayed publication is that the peer reviewers often recommend that additional experiments be performed. While reviewer-suggested experiments might be intended to ensure that authors\u2019 claims are supported by substantial evidence, such requests lead to a prolonged peer review process. This not only keeps good science away from the public but also increases the cost of labs since additional experiments need to be conducted. Do reviewer-suggested experiments really help in improving the research data or are the suggestions made indiscriminately? Can journal editors play a role in ensuring that peer review is conducted responsibly? Read the article that discusses these issues in depth.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","width":656,"height":336},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/is-reviewers-demand-for-more-experiments-justified#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Is reviewers&#8217; demand for more experiments justified?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","name":"Editage Insights","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization","name":"Editage Insights","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":324,"caption":"Editage Insights"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","https:\/\/x.com\/Editage"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d","name":"Sneha Kulkarni","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sneha Kulkarni"},"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/sneha-kulkarni"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1390","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1390"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1390\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1390"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1390"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1390"},{"taxonomy":"new_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_categories?post=1390"},{"taxonomy":"new_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_tags?post=1390"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=1390"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}