{"id":1543,"date":"2015-11-30T14:18:38","date_gmt":"2015-11-30T14:18:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015\/"},"modified":"2025-04-04T09:27:13","modified_gmt":"2025-04-04T09:27:13","slug":"academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015","title":{"rendered":"Academic publishing and scholarly communications: Good reads, November 2015"},"content":{"rendered":"

November was an interesting month for the scholarly communication folks. This month was marked by discussions around irreproducibility, authorship conflict, and costs of publishing among others. Our editors followed all of these deliberations and would like to give you a glimpse into the most engaging perspectives on research and academic publishing. Happy reading!<\/span><\/p>\n

1.\u00a0Mass authorship:<\/strong> There has been a shift in the publishing landscape with papers now having as many as several thousand authors<\/a>. Hilda Bastian follows the journey of scientific publishing and looks closely at \u201cHow did we get from there [sole authors] to first collaborating and sharing credit, and then the leap to hyperauthorship in the 2000s?<\/a>\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

2. Irreproducibility of research:<\/strong> Irreproducibility is turning out to be the soft underbelly of science<\/a>. Is there a way to tackle this problem? Contemplating this issue, Dorothy Bishop provides insightful suggestions on what funders can do to address the reproducibility issues<\/a>. \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

3.<\/strong> Gender and work-life balance in academia:<\/strong> The Leadership Foundation report reveals a \u201cclearly evident gender difference\u201d in academicians\u2019 satisfaction with work-life balance<\/a>. While about 60 per cent of male academic leaders are happy with their work-life balance, with female leaders, the figure drops to 40 per cent. Women in leadership positions in academia are also far more likely to suffer from stress than their male peers, says the report.<\/span><\/p>\n

4. The need for journals:<\/strong> With the rising journal subscription fees and an increase in the cost of publishing, Jason Schmitt ponders whether \u201cA better approach to academic publishing is to cut out the whole notion of publishing.<\/a>\u201d \u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

5.<\/strong> Racial bias in grants:<\/strong> Recently released data from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) reveals a racial disparity in grants funded by the NIH. \u201cMinority scientists are less likely than their peers to have biomedical research grants funded \u2014 and the disparity has barely changed in 30 years<\/a>,\u201d informs this article from Nature<\/em>.<\/span><\/p>\n

6. Authorship conflict:\u00a0<\/strong>The<\/span>\u00a0<\/span>“prickly topic” of assigning credit to authors surfaced on social media, raising a few crucial issues<\/a>. Some academics pointed out how papers with too many authors can make the publishing process complex and how the order of authors can be subjective. Further discussion followed on whether point-based criteria for authorship order would resolve this issue.<\/span><\/p>\n

7.\u00a0Retraction notices:<\/strong> Many journals have been reproached for displaying short and often vague retraction notices. Editors are encouraged to publish detailed retraction notices as this can help in reducing the stigma surrounding retraction. Recently, the\u00a0Journal of Biological Chemistry<\/em><\/a>\u00a0(JBC) introduced a new policy in their editorial which stated that, \u201cJBC retraction and withdrawal notices now will explain, with as much detail as possible, why papers have been withdrawn or retracted.<\/a>\u201d\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

For regular updates on important happenings in the journal publishing industry, watch our\u00a0Industry News<\/a> section.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

November was an interesting month for the scholarly communication folks. This month was marked by discussions around irreproducibility, authorship conflict, and costs of publishing among others. Our editors followed all of these deliberations and would like to give you a glimpse into the most engaging perspectives on research and academic publishing. Happy reading! 1.\u00a0Mass authorship: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":33313,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2382],"tags":[2463],"new_categories":[],"new_tags":[],"series":[],"class_list":["post-1543","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-around-the-web","tag-recommended-reading"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAcademic publishing and scholarly communications: Good reads, November 2015 | Editage Insights<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"November was an interesting month for the scholarly communication folks. This month was marked by discussions around irreproducibility, authorship conflict, and costs of publishing among others. Our editors followed all of these deliberations and would like to give you a glimpse into the most engaging perspectives on research\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Academic publishing and scholarly communications: Good reads, November 2015 | Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"November was an interesting month for the scholarly communication folks. This month was marked by discussions around irreproducibility, authorship conflict, and costs of publishing among others. Our editors followed all of these deliberations and would like to give you a glimpse into the most engaging perspectives on research\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-11-30T14:18:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-04T09:27:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/Good-reads-resized_11_0.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"656\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"336\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Editage Insights\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/71ff452a0868e4716ad471b4a1ed6df6\"},\"headline\":\"Academic publishing and scholarly communications: Good reads, November 2015\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-30T14:18:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-04T09:27:13+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015\"},\"wordCount\":458,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"Recommended Reading\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Around the web\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015\",\"name\":\"Academic publishing and scholarly communications: Good reads, November 2015 | Editage Insights\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-30T14:18:38+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-04T09:27:13+00:00\",\"description\":\"November was an interesting month for the scholarly communication folks. This month was marked by discussions around irreproducibility, authorship conflict, and costs of publishing among others. Our editors followed all of these deliberations and would like to give you a glimpse into the most engaging perspectives on research\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"width\":656,\"height\":336},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Academic publishing and scholarly communications: Good reads, November 2015\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":324,\"caption\":\"Editage Insights\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Editage\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/71ff452a0868e4716ad471b4a1ed6df6\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9d33a4703576af04935cc28dc48b743638328ea5bb37abe951330e2024defb9e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9d33a4703576af04935cc28dc48b743638328ea5bb37abe951330e2024defb9e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Editage Insights\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/editage-insights\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Academic publishing and scholarly communications: Good reads, November 2015 | Editage Insights","description":"November was an interesting month for the scholarly communication folks. This month was marked by discussions around irreproducibility, authorship conflict, and costs of publishing among others. Our editors followed all of these deliberations and would like to give you a glimpse into the most engaging perspectives on research","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Academic publishing and scholarly communications: Good reads, November 2015 | Editage Insights","og_description":"November was an interesting month for the scholarly communication folks. This month was marked by discussions around irreproducibility, authorship conflict, and costs of publishing among others. Our editors followed all of these deliberations and would like to give you a glimpse into the most engaging perspectives on research","og_url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015","og_site_name":"Editage Insights","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","article_published_time":"2015-11-30T14:18:38+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-04-04T09:27:13+00:00","og_image":[{"width":656,"height":336,"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/Good-reads-resized_11_0.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Editage Insights","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Editage","twitter_site":"@Editage","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Editage Insights","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015"},"author":{"name":"Editage Insights","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/71ff452a0868e4716ad471b4a1ed6df6"},"headline":"Academic publishing and scholarly communications: Good reads, November 2015","datePublished":"2015-11-30T14:18:38+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-04T09:27:13+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015"},"wordCount":458,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","keywords":["Recommended Reading"],"articleSection":["Around the web"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015","name":"Academic publishing and scholarly communications: Good reads, November 2015 | Editage Insights","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","datePublished":"2015-11-30T14:18:38+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-04T09:27:13+00:00","description":"November was an interesting month for the scholarly communication folks. This month was marked by discussions around irreproducibility, authorship conflict, and costs of publishing among others. Our editors followed all of these deliberations and would like to give you a glimpse into the most engaging perspectives on research","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","width":656,"height":336},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/academic-publishing-and-scholarly-communications-good-reads-november-2015#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Academic publishing and scholarly communications: Good reads, November 2015"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","name":"Editage Insights","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization","name":"Editage Insights","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":324,"caption":"Editage Insights"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","https:\/\/x.com\/Editage"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/71ff452a0868e4716ad471b4a1ed6df6","name":"Editage Insights","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9d33a4703576af04935cc28dc48b743638328ea5bb37abe951330e2024defb9e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/9d33a4703576af04935cc28dc48b743638328ea5bb37abe951330e2024defb9e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Editage Insights"},"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/editage-insights"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1543","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1543"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1543\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1543"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1543"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1543"},{"taxonomy":"new_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_categories?post=1543"},{"taxonomy":"new_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_tags?post=1543"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=1543"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}