{"id":2305,"date":"2026-05-31T15:40:40","date_gmt":"2026-05-31T10:10:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps\/"},"modified":"2026-05-31T14:47:38","modified_gmt":"2026-05-31T09:17:38","slug":"dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps","title":{"rendered":"How to identify research gaps: Using research gaps to create a research question"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In this article, you\u2019ll learn<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"#_Toc230445204\">What is a Research Gap?<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#_Toc230445205\">Understanding the Taxonomy of Research Gaps<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#_Toc230445206\">Why Identifying Gaps Strengthens Your Research<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#_Toc230445207\">The Step-by-Step Framework for Identifying Research Gaps<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#_Toc230445208\">The PICOS Framework: A Standardized Approach to Defining Gaps<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#_Toc230445209\">Advanced Tools for Identifying Research Gaps<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#_Toc230445210\">AI and Emerging Technologies for Gap Detection<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#_Toc230445211\">Formulating Research Questions from Identified Gaps<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#_Toc230445212\">Common Pitfalls When Identifying Gaps<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#_Toc230445213\">Verifying Your Gap: A Critical Checklist<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#_Toc230445214\">Moving Forward: From Gap to Study Design<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"#_Toc230445215\">Summary: The Research Gap Framework at a Glance<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h2><a name=\"_Toc230445204\"><\/a>What is a Research Gap?<\/h2>\n<p>A research gap is an unanswered question or unexplored area within existing scientific knowledge. It is the space where current research falls short, evidence is insufficient, or entirely new questions remain unexamined. Unlike research limitations, which are the acknowledged weaknesses in individual studies, a research gap emerges from analyzing the collective body of literature and identifying what is <em>collectively <\/em>missing.<\/p>\n<h3>Why Research Gaps Matter<\/h3>\n<p>Identifying research gaps is foundational to evidence-based research. Whether you are developing a dissertation, preparing a grant proposal, or planning a clinical study, gaps define where your work will contribute meaningfully. A well-identified gap ensures your research:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Addresses a genuine, unanswered question rather than repeating existing work<\/li>\n<li>Has practical or theoretical implications for your field<\/li>\n<li>Increases the likelihood of publication and impact<\/li>\n<li>Guides the design of rigorous, justifiable studies<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Without a clear gap, even well-conducted research risks minimal contribution to the field&#8217;s knowledge base.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2><a name=\"_Toc230445205\"><\/a>Understanding the Taxonomy of Research Gaps<\/h2>\n<p>Not all gaps are created equal. Research gaps fall into distinct categories. Understanding these types helps you recognize gaps when you encounter them during literature review and evaluate whether a gap is worth pursuing.<\/p>\n<h3>Population-Specific Gaps<\/h3>\n<p>These gaps exist when a research topic has been studied extensively in one population but remains unexplored in another. Examples include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Geographic\/regional gaps: A medication&#8217;s efficacy may be well-documented in North American populations but unstudied in East Asian cohorts<\/li>\n<li>Demographic gaps: Extensive research on adolescents and social media, but minimal research on older adults in the same context<\/li>\n<li>Clinical gaps: Biomarkers for cardiovascular disease thoroughly characterized in men, but underexplored in women<\/li>\n<li>Socioeconomic gaps: Treatment outcomes well-studied in high-income settings but unknown in resource-limited environments<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Methodological Gaps<\/h3>\n<p>These gaps occur when existing research relies on limited study designs or when new methodologies have not yet been applied to established research questions.<\/p>\n<p>Examples include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Qualitative research absent where quantitative data dominates (or vice versa)<\/li>\n<li>Longitudinal studies lacking despite need for temporal understanding<\/li>\n<li>Real-world evidence unavailable despite clinical trial data<\/li>\n<li>Advanced imaging or molecular techniques (multi-omics, AI-powered diagnosis) not yet applied to a particular disease<\/li>\n<li>Mixed-methods approaches missing in fields reliant on single methodologies<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Temporal Gaps<\/h3>\n<p>Research can become outdated or emerge as a new field. Temporal gaps include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Outdated literature: Studies on Internet health information use from 2005 may no longer reflect current digital behavior<\/li>\n<li>Emerging technologies: AI and machine learning have created gaps in how these are applied to traditional clinical problems<\/li>\n<li>Trend shifts: Historical prevalence data no longer representative of current disease burden<\/li>\n<li>Evolution of disease: New variants or resistant strains that supersede older research<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Theoretical and Consistency Gaps<\/h3>\n<p>These gaps manifest when findings conflict, underlying mechanisms are poorly understood, or theoretical frameworks are underdeveloped.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Contradictory results: Some studies show an intervention effective while others show no effect; the reason for inconsistency is unknown<\/li>\n<li>Mechanistic gaps: Clinical observations without explanation (e.g., why do certain patients respond differently?)<\/li>\n<li>Theoretical framework gaps: A clinical phenomenon described but not explained by existing theory<\/li>\n<li>Knowledge integration gaps: Evidence exists in silos without cross-disciplinary synthesis<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Contextual and Application Gaps<\/h3>\n<p>These gaps reflect differences in settings, conditions, or real-world applicability.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Clinical setting gaps: Efficacy in tertiary hospitals unknown in primary care settings<\/li>\n<li>Disease stage gaps: Early-stage disease well-studied; advanced disease progression unclear<\/li>\n<li>Comorbidity gaps: Single-disease focus despite common co-occurring conditions<\/li>\n<li>Implementation gaps: Efficacy proven, but how to operationalize in practice remains unclear<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2><a name=\"_Toc230445206\"><\/a>Why Identifying Gaps Strengthens Your Research<\/h2>\n<h3>Beyond Academic Exercise<\/h3>\n<p>Identifying gaps is not simply an academic requirement; it directly shapes research quality and impact.<\/p>\n<p>A well-defined gap:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Provides explicit justification for your study design<\/li>\n<li>Helps you set realistic, measurable research objectives<\/li>\n<li>Strengthens grant applications by showing you understand the landscape<\/li>\n<li>Differentiates your work from existing studies<\/li>\n<li>Increases likelihood of publication by demonstrating novelty<\/li>\n<li>Ensures your research addresses a question clinicians, patients, or policymakers actually care about<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>The Reality Check: Not All Gaps Are Worth Pursuing<\/h3>\n<p>Identifying a gap is not sufficient on its own. Before committing to a research gap, ask:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Would filling this gap improve clinical practice or patient outcomes?<\/li>\n<li>Does it advance theoretical understanding in meaningful ways?<\/li>\n<li>Is the gap actually answerable with current methods and resources?<\/li>\n<li>Do stakeholders (clinicians, patients, policymakers) recognize this as a priority?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A gap may be intellectually interesting but lack practical value. Some gaps persist because they are genuinely difficult or less important than they appear.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2><a name=\"_Toc230445207\"><\/a>The Step-by-Step Framework for Identifying Research Gaps<\/h2>\n<p>Identifying gaps requires systematic, exhaustive engagement with literature rather than casual reading. Follow this structured approach:<\/p>\n<h3>Step 1: Conduct an Exhaustive Literature Review<\/h3>\n<p>A good <a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-write-the-literature-review-of-your-research-paper\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">literature review<\/a> is the foundation. Begin broadly, then refine systematically.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Identify 3-5 core databases relevant to your field<\/li>\n<li>Develop a search strategy using controlled vocabulary (MeSH terms, subject headings)<\/li>\n<li>Search for original research across multiple methodologies (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, systematic reviews)<\/li>\n<li>Don&#8217;t rely on a single database or search term; broaden your net<\/li>\n<li>Track what you find in an organized database or spreadsheet, noting key themes and findings<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Step 2: Examine Future Research and Limitations Sections<\/h3>\n<p>Authors frequently highlight research gaps they themselves have identified. This is not a shortcut to finding a gap in the <em>overall literature<\/em> however but it can give you some clues.<\/p>\n<p>What to look for:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Explicit statements about &#8220;future research needed&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>Acknowledged limitations that suggest extensions<\/li>\n<li>Areas the authors did not investigate but recognized as important<\/li>\n<li>Unanswered mechanistic questions<\/li>\n<li>Populations or settings the authors could not study<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Create a running list of these author-identified gaps. <strong>However, verify that these gaps have not already been addressed by newer research.<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>Step 3: Map and Organize Existing Research<\/h3>\n<p>Visualizing the research landscape reveals voids more clearly than reading alone.<\/p>\n<p>Create concept maps or tables that organize studies by:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Population characteristics<\/li>\n<li>Study design and methodology<\/li>\n<li>Key findings<\/li>\n<li>Geographic location<\/li>\n<li>Time period<\/li>\n<li>Outcomes measured<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This visualization helps you see patterns and identify where research clusters exist and where the literature is sparse.<\/p>\n<h3>Step 4: Compare Across Contexts<\/h3>\n<p>Gaps often become apparent when you compare findings across different dimensions.<\/p>\n<p>Systematic comparison checklist:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Does this finding hold across different populations (age, sex, ethnicity, geography)?<\/li>\n<li>Have different methodologies been applied, or does one approach dominate?<\/li>\n<li>Are results consistent across different time periods or settings?<\/li>\n<li>Have emerging technologies or theoretical frameworks been applied?<\/li>\n<li>Is there evidence from low-income countries as well as high-income countries?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>When the answer to any question is &#8220;no&#8221; or &#8220;insufficiently,&#8221; you may have identified a gap.<\/p>\n<h3>Step 5: Use Advanced Databases and Citation Tracking<\/h3>\n<p>Move beyond simple Google Scholar searches. Strategic database use reveals gaps more efficiently.<\/p>\n<h4>Database-Specific Strategies<\/h4>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Database<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>How to Use for Gap Identification<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>PubMed<\/td>\n<td>Search using MeSH terms plus field codes; use &#8220;Filters&#8221; to identify <a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/a-young-researchers-guide-to-a-systematic-review\">systematic reviews<\/a>, meta-analyses separately. Note what diseases\/populations dominate vs. are absent<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Web of Science<\/td>\n<td>Use &#8220;Document Type&#8221; filter to examine review articles; use &#8220;Citation Report&#8221; to identify seminal works and which studies cite them; look for research clusters and isolated areas<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Scopus<\/td>\n<td>Similar to Web of Science; use &#8220;Subject Area&#8221; filters to see interdisciplinary gaps (e.g., where psychology meets neurobiology)<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>CINAHL (nursing\/clinical)<\/td>\n<td>Filter by &#8220;Publication Type&#8221; &gt; &#8220;Systematic Review&#8221; or &#8220;Meta-analysis&#8221; to quickly find synthesis studies identifying gaps<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>PsycINFO<\/td>\n<td>Use &#8220;Methodology&#8221; section in advanced search to isolate literature reviews, meta-analyses; filter by age group, population<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Google Scholar<\/td>\n<td>Identify highly-cited papers (seminal works); examine who cites them and how the field has evolved<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h4>Seminal Works Strategy<\/h4>\n<p>Seminal works are repeatedly cited foundational studies. Identifying and tracking these reveals how a field has developed:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Find the most-cited paper in your topic<\/li>\n<li>Read it thoroughly<\/li>\n<li>Use Web of Science or Scopus to see all subsequent papers citing it<\/li>\n<li>Note how the field has evolved from that foundation<\/li>\n<li>Identify what questions the seminal work raised but did not answer<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Tools like SAGE Navigator or Connected Papers visualize these citation networks, making gap-spotting more efficient.<\/p>\n<h3><\/h3>\n<h3>Step 6: Consult with Experts and Engage in Academic Discourse<\/h3>\n<p>Literature alone may miss emerging gaps or field-specific priorities that are not yet published.<\/p>\n<p>Expert consultation strategies:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Discuss your preliminary gap findings with dissertation advisors or mentors<\/li>\n<li>Attend departmental seminars and journal clubs where researchers present and discuss gaps in their fields<\/li>\n<li>Participate in online academic communities and forums<\/li>\n<li>Interview clinicians or practitioners about unanswered questions in their work<\/li>\n<li>Review grant funding priorities from major agencies\u2014they often highlight recognized gaps<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Experts can redirect you away from gaps that are actually being pursued but not yet published, or toward emerging areas overlooked in the literature.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2><a name=\"_Toc230445208\"><\/a>The PICOS Framework: A Standardized Approach to Defining Gaps<\/h2>\n<p>The PICOS structure provides a standardized method for characterizing research gaps. Originally developed for systematic reviews, PICOS is equally valuable for identifying what your own research should address.<\/p>\n<p>PICOS stands for:<\/p>\n<h3>Population (P): Who is the study about?<\/h3>\n<p>Questions to ask:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What populations have been studied extensively?<\/li>\n<li>Which populations are underrepresented or entirely absent from the literature?<\/li>\n<li>Are findings consistent across different ages, sexes, ethnicities, or socioeconomic statuses?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Example: HIV treatment outcomes are well-documented in adult cohorts but less well-characterized in adolescents or postmenopausal women.<\/p>\n<h3>Intervention (I): What treatment, exposure, or condition is being examined?<\/h3>\n<p>Questions to ask:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Has this intervention been tested in the way I am proposing?<\/li>\n<li>Have newer formulations, dosages, or delivery methods been studied?<\/li>\n<li>Has this been tested in combinations with other treatments?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Example: Checkpoint inhibitors are well-studied in melanoma and lung cancer but understudied in rare cancers.<\/p>\n<h3>Comparison (C): What is the intervention compared against?<\/h3>\n<p>Questions to ask:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Are there active comparators, or only comparison to placebo\/standard care?<\/li>\n<li>Have head-to-head comparisons been conducted?<\/li>\n<li>What about no-treatment controls or different doses of the same agent?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Example: Many antidepressants have been compared to placebo, but direct comparisons between specific antidepressants in treatment-resistant depression are limited.<\/p>\n<h3>Outcome (O): What is being measured?<\/h3>\n<p>Questions to ask:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>What outcomes has research focused on (mortality, symptom reduction, quality of life)?<\/li>\n<li>Are patient-reported outcomes assessed, or only clinical measures?<\/li>\n<li>Have long-term outcomes been tracked, or only short-term responses?<\/li>\n<li>Are surrogate endpoints studied without validation against clinical endpoints?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Example: Cardiovascular risk reduction is well-documented with statins, but effects on cognitive outcomes or quality of life are understudied.<\/p>\n<h3>Setting (S): Where and in what context is the research conducted?<\/h3>\n<p>Questions to ask:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Has this been studied in primary care, secondary care, tertiary hospitals?<\/li>\n<li>Is real-world evidence available, or only clinical trial data?<\/li>\n<li>Has this been tested in resource-limited settings?<\/li>\n<li>Is there evidence from different healthcare systems?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Example: Many cancer therapies are proven in academic medical centers but their feasibility and outcomes in community oncology settings are unclear.<\/p>\n<h3>Application: PICOS Gap Analysis Table<\/h3>\n<p>Create a table organizing existing research by PICOS elements. Empty or sparse cells reveal gaps.<\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>PICOS Element<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Category<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Evidence Exists?<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Gap Identified?<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Population<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Adult men, 50-70 years<\/td>\n<td>Yes, extensive<\/td>\n<td>No<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Population<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Women, 50-70 years<\/td>\n<td>Yes, limited<\/td>\n<td>Possible inconsistency<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Population<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Young adults, 20-40 years<\/td>\n<td>Sparse<\/td>\n<td><strong>YES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Intervention<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Standard dose, IV administration<\/td>\n<td>Yes, extensive<\/td>\n<td>No<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Intervention<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>High-dose variant<\/td>\n<td>Yes, limited<\/td>\n<td>Possible<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Intervention<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Oral formulation<\/td>\n<td>None found<\/td>\n<td><strong>YES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Comparison<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Placebo<\/td>\n<td>Yes, multiple trials<\/td>\n<td>No<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Comparison<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Active comparator<\/td>\n<td>One study only<\/td>\n<td><strong>YES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Outcome<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Mortality at 5 years<\/td>\n<td>Yes, well-documented<\/td>\n<td>No<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Outcome<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Quality of life<\/td>\n<td>One study<\/td>\n<td><strong>YES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Setting<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Academic hospital<\/td>\n<td>Yes, extensive<\/td>\n<td>No<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Setting<\/strong><\/td>\n<td>Primary care clinic<\/td>\n<td>None found<\/td>\n<td><strong>YES<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>This table makes gaps explicit and actionable.<\/p>\n<h2><\/h2>\n<h2><a name=\"_Toc230445209\"><\/a>Advanced Tools for Identifying Research Gaps<\/h2>\n<p>Traditional literature review remains essential, but modern tools accelerate gap identification.<\/p>\n<h3>Citation Network Visualization Tools<\/h3>\n<p>Connected Papers, Dimensions, and Meta visualize how studies relate to one another, revealing research clusters and isolated areas.<\/p>\n<p>How to use:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Enter a seminal paper relevant to your topic<\/li>\n<li>The tool generates a network showing related papers<\/li>\n<li>Dense clusters indicate well-researched areas<\/li>\n<li>Sparse or disconnected regions suggest gaps<\/li>\n<li>Follow citation trails to explore emerging areas<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>AI-Powered Literature Analysis<\/h3>\n<p>Emerging tools use artificial intelligence to detect gaps across large bodies of literature more rapidly than manual review.<\/p>\n<p>What these tools do:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Analyze patterns across thousands of papers simultaneously<\/li>\n<li>Identify understudied populations, methodologies, or outcomes<\/li>\n<li>Highlight conflicting findings that warrant investigation<\/li>\n<li>Summarize research trends over time<\/li>\n<li>Suggest emerging topics with insufficient evidence<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>While not replacing critical reading, AI tools are increasingly valuable for large literature landscapes.<\/p>\n<h3>Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review Articles<\/h3>\n<p>These synthesis papers explicitly discuss gaps in current knowledge. They are invaluable resources.<\/p>\n<p>How to find and use them:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Search your topic plus &#8220;systematic review&#8221; or &#8220;meta-analysis&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>In database advanced search, use Document Type or Publication Type filters<\/li>\n<li>Read the &#8220;Discussion&#8221; and &#8220;Limitations&#8221; sections closely<\/li>\n<li>Authors of synthesis studies have deliberately searched exhaustively, so their identified gaps are usually reliable<\/li>\n<li>Use these papers as a starting point, then verify gaps have not been addressed by newer literature<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2><\/h2>\n<h2><a name=\"_Toc230445210\"><\/a>AI and Emerging Technologies for Gap Detection<\/h2>\n<p>The research landscape is evolving. Modern researchers have access to tools like <a href=\"https:\/\/discovery.researcher.life\/ask-rdiscovery\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">R Discovery<\/a> that accelerate gap identification.<\/p>\n<h3>What AI Can Do<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Rapidly scan large bodies of literature<\/li>\n<li>Detect patterns humans might miss<\/li>\n<li>Identify understudied populations or methodologies<\/li>\n<li>Flag conflicting findings that suggest unresolved questions<\/li>\n<li>Track emerging areas with insufficient evidence base<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>What AI Cannot Do (Yet)<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Understand context and nuance at the depth humans can<\/li>\n<li>Make judgments about whether a gap is worth pursuing<\/li>\n<li>Evaluate the quality of evidence critically<\/li>\n<li>Engage with tacit knowledge in a field<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Use AI as an accelerator, not a replacement for critical thinking.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2><a name=\"_Toc230445211\"><\/a>Formulating Research Questions from Identified Gaps<\/h2>\n<p>Once you have identified a gap, the next step is translating it into a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-choose-a-research-question\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">focused research question<\/a>. This question guides your entire study design.<\/p>\n<h3>From Gap to Research Question<\/h3>\n<p>Effective research questions derived from gaps share common characteristics:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Specificity: The question is answerable and focused, not vague<\/li>\n<li>Feasibility: Your resources and timeline allow you to answer it<\/li>\n<li>Relevance: Answering the question would advance knowledge or practice<\/li>\n<li>Novelty: The question has not been definitively answered<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Examples of Gap-to-Question Translation<\/h3>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Gap Identified<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>Research Question<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td>Statin efficacy understudied in women over 70<\/td>\n<td>Does high-intensity statin therapy reduce cardiovascular events in women aged 70+ with prior myocardial infarction?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Immunotherapy response mechanisms unclear in lung cancer<\/td>\n<td>What tumor microenvironment characteristics predict response to PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with NSCLC?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Oral formulation of medication not tested<\/td>\n<td>Is bioavailability of oral formulation X non-inferior to IV formulation in adults with condition Y?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Quality of life outcomes not measured in clinical trials<\/td>\n<td>What is the effect of treatment X on functional status and patient-reported quality of life in survivors?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>Gap in primary care evidence for condition<\/td>\n<td>What is the diagnostic accuracy of rapid point-of-care test Z compared to gold standard in primary care settings?<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Strong research questions are narrow enough to answer but broad enough to matter.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2><a name=\"_Toc230445212\"><\/a>Common Pitfalls When Identifying Gaps<\/h2>\n<h3>Pitfall 1: Mistaking a Limitation for a Gap<\/h3>\n<p>Individual studies have limitations. A limitation in one study is not a gap in the literature.<\/p>\n<p>Example:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Study Limitation: &#8220;We studied only patients aged 18-45, so generalizability to older adults is unknown&#8221;<\/li>\n<li>Research Gap: &#8220;After reviewing all literature on this topic, treatment outcomes in adults over 65 have not been systematically studied&#8221;<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Only if multiple high-quality studies collectively avoid a population does a gap exist.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>Pitfall 2: Pursuing a Gap That No One Cares About<\/h3>\n<p>You may identify a technically interesting gap that has little practical value.<\/p>\n<p>Before pursuing a gap, verify:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Do clinicians identify this as a priority?<\/li>\n<li>Would patients benefit from answering this question?<\/li>\n<li>Do policymakers or funders recognize this as important?<\/li>\n<li>Would the answer change practice?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>Pitfall 3: Assuming a Gap Means No Research Exists<\/h3>\n<p>A gap is not the complete absence of research. More often, it means research is limited, contradictory, or conducted in narrow populations.<\/p>\n<p>Before claiming a gap, ensure:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>You have searched exhaustively (multiple databases, multiple search strategies)<\/li>\n<li>You have verified findings are actually absent, not simply not aggregated<\/li>\n<li>You have checked recent publications (gaps in mature fields close quickly)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>Pitfall 4: Overlooking Published Gaps in Synthesis Papers<\/h3>\n<p>Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have already identified many gaps. Starting your gap identification by reviewing these synthesis papers saves time and ensures you are not duplicating effort.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h3>Pitfall 5: Confusing Emerging Fields with Gaps<\/h3>\n<p>A new field with limited research is not necessarily a gap in knowledge about an established topic. Ensure you are addressing a gap within a specific research domain, not simply working in a newer area.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2><a name=\"_Toc230445213\"><\/a>Verifying Your Gap: A Critical Checklist<\/h2>\n<p>Before finalizing a research gap as the foundation for your work, verify it against these criteria:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>I have conducted a systematic literature review across multiple databases<\/li>\n<li>I have examined limitations and future research sections of key papers<\/li>\n<li>I have organized findings in a visual format (concept map, table) and identified voids<\/li>\n<li>I have used PICOS or similar framework to characterize what exists and what is missing<\/li>\n<li>I have consulted with mentors, advisors, or experts who confirmed this gap is recognized<\/li>\n<li>The gap is specific enough to guide study design but broad enough to matter<\/li>\n<li>Filling this gap would benefit patients, clinicians, or the field theoretically<\/li>\n<li>I have verified this gap has not been addressed by very recent publications (last 12 months)<\/li>\n<li>The gap is feasible to address with available resources and timeline<\/li>\n<li>Multiple lines of evidence (research papers, expert input, clinical need) converge on this gap<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>If you cannot confidently check each box, return to earlier steps in this framework.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2><a name=\"_Toc230445214\"><\/a>Moving Forward: From Gap to Study Design<\/h2>\n<p>Identifying a gap is the beginning, not the end. Once you have a well-defined gap, your next steps depend on your context:<\/p>\n<h3>If you\u2019re writing a dissertation or thesis<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Use your gap statement in your research proposal and all subsequent chapters<\/li>\n<li>Design your study methodology to directly address the gap you identified<\/li>\n<li>Reference your gap throughout to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/qualitative-quantitative-or-mixed-methods-a-quick-guide-to-choose-the-right-design-for-your-research\">justify design choices<\/a> and significance<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>If you\u2019re applying for a grant<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Articulate the gap clearly in the &#8220;Significance&#8221; or &#8220;Specific Aims&#8221; section<\/li>\n<li>Show how the gap is recognized by your field (cite key papers or expert input)<\/li>\n<li>Demonstrate that your proposed research is designed to fill this specific gap<\/li>\n<li>Emphasize how addressing it will advance the field or practice<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>If you\u2019re a clinician or practitioner<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Identify gaps in your clinical area to guide research you conduct or support<\/li>\n<li>Use gaps to prioritize which emerging evidence to implement<\/li>\n<li>Share recognized gaps with researchers who might address them<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>If you\u2019re writing a journal article<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Position your study as addressing a specific, well-documented gap<\/li>\n<li>Use gap identification as the foundation of your introduction<\/li>\n<li>In the discussion, articulate remaining gaps that your study did not address<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2><a name=\"_Toc230445215\"><\/a>Summary: The Research Gap Framework at a Glance<\/h2>\n<p>Research gap identification is systematic, not serendipitous. Follow this framework:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Understand gap types<\/strong>: Population, methodological, temporal, theoretical, contextual<\/li>\n<li><strong>Conduct exhaustive review<\/strong>: Multiple databases, multiple methodologies, multiple search strategies<\/li>\n<li><strong>Mine existing literature<\/strong>: Focus on limitations and future research sections<\/li>\n<li><strong>Organize your findings<\/strong>: Use concept maps, tables, or PICOS framework to visualize landscape<\/li>\n<li><strong>Compare across contexts<\/strong>: Look for populations, settings, or conditions where research is sparse<\/li>\n<li><strong>Consult experts<\/strong>: Verify gaps are recognized and valued by your field<\/li>\n<li><strong>Use modern tools<\/strong>: Leverage citation networks, AI-powered analysis, and synthesis papers<\/li>\n<li><strong>Formulate precise questions<\/strong>: Translate gaps into answerable, feasible research questions<\/li>\n<li><strong>Verify feasibility<\/strong>: Ensure the gap is worth pursuing and addressable<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>A well-identified gap transforms research from an academic exercise into a contribution that advances knowledge and improves practice.<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<h2>References<\/h2>\n<ol>\n<li>Robinson KA, Akinyede O, Dutta T, et al. Framework for determining research gaps during systematic review: Evaluation. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2013. <a href=\"https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/23487868\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/23487868\/<\/a><\/li>\n<li>National University Library. Literature gap and future research. The Research Process LibGuides. <a href=\"https:\/\/resources.nu.edu\/researchprocess\/literaturegap\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">https:\/\/resources.nu.edu\/researchprocess\/literaturegap<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><em>This article was originally published on February 25, 2019, and revised on June 6, 2026.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In this article, you\u2019ll learn What is a Research Gap? Understanding the Taxonomy of Research Gaps Why Identifying Gaps Strengthens Your Research The Step-by-Step Framework for Identifying Research Gaps The PICOS Framework: A Standardized Approach to Defining Gaps Advanced Tools for Identifying Research Gaps AI and Emerging Technologies for Gap Detection Formulating Research Questions from [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1116,"featured_media":45217,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2416],"tags":[1322],"new_categories":[],"new_tags":[],"series":[],"class_list":["post-2305","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-statement-of-the-problem","tag-problem-statement"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>How to identify research gaps and create a research question | Editage Insights<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Learn how to find a gap in the literature, how to make sure the gap is worth studying, and how to create a research question after identifying this gap.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What is Research Gap and how to identify research gap | Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Many researchers feel unsure of conducting a gap analysis or wonder how to find a research gap. This article provides tips on how to find a knowledge gap. Click to know more.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-31T10:10:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/ChatGPT-Image-Mar-9-2026-08_22_12-AM-1-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1536\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Fatima Qureshi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Fatima Qureshi\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"15 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Fatima Qureshi\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/4dc7362db477c88bb710df1b63d568d0\"},\"headline\":\"How to identify research gaps: Using research gaps to create a research question\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-31T10:10:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps\"},\"wordCount\":3334,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/ChatGPT-Image-Mar-9-2026-08_22_12-AM-1-1.png\",\"keywords\":[\"problem statement\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Statement of the Problem\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps\",\"name\":\"How to identify research gaps and create a research question | Editage Insights\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/ChatGPT-Image-Mar-9-2026-08_22_12-AM-1-1.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-31T10:10:40+00:00\",\"description\":\"Learn how to find a gap in the literature, how to make sure the gap is worth studying, and how to create a research question after identifying this gap.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/ChatGPT-Image-Mar-9-2026-08_22_12-AM-1-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/ChatGPT-Image-Mar-9-2026-08_22_12-AM-1-1.png\",\"width\":1536,\"height\":1024,\"caption\":\"Finding gaps in research\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How to identify research gaps: Using research gaps to create a research question\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":324,\"caption\":\"Editage Insights\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Editage\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/4dc7362db477c88bb710df1b63d568d0\",\"name\":\"Fatima Qureshi\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a2f77800f862da5c32f60bd4c3149979367b3e522d64c559d873e2ec3a0dfd6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a2f77800f862da5c32f60bd4c3149979367b3e522d64c559d873e2ec3a0dfd6?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Fatima Qureshi\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/fatima-qureshi-0\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How to identify research gaps and create a research question | Editage Insights","description":"Learn how to find a gap in the literature, how to make sure the gap is worth studying, and how to create a research question after identifying this gap.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What is Research Gap and how to identify research gap | Editage Insights","og_description":"Many researchers feel unsure of conducting a gap analysis or wonder how to find a research gap. This article provides tips on how to find a knowledge gap. Click to know more.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps","og_site_name":"Editage Insights","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","article_published_time":"2026-05-31T10:10:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1536,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/ChatGPT-Image-Mar-9-2026-08_22_12-AM-1-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Fatima Qureshi","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Editage","twitter_site":"@Editage","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Fatima Qureshi","Est. reading time":"15 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps"},"author":{"name":"Fatima Qureshi","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/4dc7362db477c88bb710df1b63d568d0"},"headline":"How to identify research gaps: Using research gaps to create a research question","datePublished":"2026-05-31T10:10:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps"},"wordCount":3334,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/ChatGPT-Image-Mar-9-2026-08_22_12-AM-1-1.png","keywords":["problem statement"],"articleSection":["Statement of the Problem"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps","name":"How to identify research gaps and create a research question | Editage Insights","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/ChatGPT-Image-Mar-9-2026-08_22_12-AM-1-1.png","datePublished":"2026-05-31T10:10:40+00:00","description":"Learn how to find a gap in the literature, how to make sure the gap is worth studying, and how to create a research question after identifying this gap.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/ChatGPT-Image-Mar-9-2026-08_22_12-AM-1-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/ChatGPT-Image-Mar-9-2026-08_22_12-AM-1-1.png","width":1536,"height":1024,"caption":"Finding gaps in research"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/dont-know-where-to-start-6-tips-on-identifying-research-gaps#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How to identify research gaps: Using research gaps to create a research question"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","name":"Editage Insights","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization","name":"Editage Insights","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":324,"caption":"Editage Insights"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","https:\/\/x.com\/Editage"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/4dc7362db477c88bb710df1b63d568d0","name":"Fatima Qureshi","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a2f77800f862da5c32f60bd4c3149979367b3e522d64c559d873e2ec3a0dfd6?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3a2f77800f862da5c32f60bd4c3149979367b3e522d64c559d873e2ec3a0dfd6?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Fatima Qureshi"},"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/fatima-qureshi-0"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2305","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1116"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2305"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2305\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47348,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2305\/revisions\/47348"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/45217"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2305"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2305"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2305"},{"taxonomy":"new_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_categories?post=2305"},{"taxonomy":"new_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_tags?post=2305"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=2305"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}