{"id":2946,"date":"2019-06-18T13:20:15","date_gmt":"2019-06-18T13:20:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/130-papers-by-a-research-institute-under-scanner-for-image-manipulation\/"},"modified":"2025-01-15T06:33:04","modified_gmt":"2025-01-15T06:33:04","slug":"130-papers-by-a-research-institute-under-scanner-for-image-manipulation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/130-papers-by-a-research-institute-under-scanner-for-image-manipulation","title":{"rendered":"130 Papers by a research institute under scanner for image manipulation"},"content":{"rendered":"

The integrity of 130 papers published in peer reviewed journals by scientists affiliated with the Indian Institute of Toxicology Research (IITR) has come under the scanner after commenters on PubPeer suspected image manipulation in them. PubPeer is a platform that allows academics to share anonymous comments on scientific papers post publication. <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Apart from this, The Hindu<\/a><\/i> reported that 31 papers from the CSIR-Indian Institute of Chemical Biology (CSIR-IICB) and 35 from the CSIR-Central Drug Research Institute (CSIR-CDRI) have also been flagged on PubPeer for possible image manipulation. <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Among the flagged papers, 40 are authored by Dr. Yogeshwer Shukla, a senior scientist at IITR. Defending himself, Dr. Shukla said: \u201cI admit that unintentional mistakes might have been made. There was no way to check if the images have already been used in other papers<\/a>.\u201d He further added that his research integrity is being questioned \u201cto create doubts about Ayurveda and to target someone.\u201d <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Some of the papers flagged for questionable images have been retracted and corrected. A paper by Naibedya Chattopadhyay, a researcher at CSIR-CDRI, was retracted for manipulation of images. Commenting on it, he explained that he was a \u201cco-author and not the corresponding author of the paper that has been retracted<\/a>.\u201d He further clarified that image duplication in papers where he is the corresponding author was not \u201ca deliberate act\u201d but an error in \u201ccopying and pasting of images.\u201d Claiming that the errors did not affect the conclusion of the papers and the journals verified the raw data used in the research and subsequently issued corrigendum, he added that, \u201cSo, to call these mistakes as image manipulation is factually incorrect.\u201d <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

The Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), the parent body of IITR, has ordered an investigation into the matter. A three-member committee has been formed to investigate problematic papers from IITR within a defined timeframe. Since some of the papers under investigation include those by senior researchers and the former and current directors of the IITR, the committee has been instructed to be \u201cobjective, fair, and fiercely impartial in their investigations<\/a>.\u201d <\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

\u201cCSIR has a zero tolerance policy on the issue of scientific integrity. In the past, such matters have been dealt with very firmly,\u201d told Shekhar Mande, Director-General of CSIR, to The Hindu<\/i> in an email. He added that: \u201cIf anyone is found to be guilty of manipulations thereby leading to deliberate scientific fraud, the person will face suitable disciplinary action.\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Discussing the prevalence of image manipulation in scientific research, Dr. Elisabeth M. Bik, a California-based science consultant who has discovered manipulations in several papers including those from IITR, said that it is difficult to detect malpractices as \u201cthere is no good software yet on the market to automatically screen images for duplications<\/a>.\u201d<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

How do you think such cases of image manipulation affect the overall integrity of scientific research? What according to you is the best way to deal with such scientific misconduct? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Related reading:<\/b><\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n