{"id":37568,"date":"2025-09-19T19:55:51","date_gmt":"2025-09-19T14:25:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?p=37568"},"modified":"2025-09-19T21:10:20","modified_gmt":"2025-09-19T15:40:20","slug":"yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers","title":{"rendered":"Yesterday, today, tomorrow- peer review from the editor&#8217;s perspective"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>When a researcher wears an editor\u2019s hat<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As a scientist and researcher, one learns to question everything. As an editor, one must finally decide whether a paper is ready to move forward to publication or not. Having worn both hats for long stretches of my career, I have been able to see the researcher\u2019s perspective while deciding whether to move ahead editorially with a manuscript.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, as an editor as well as peer reviewer for several manuscripts over the years, I have seen things change drastically \u2013 with the current model at a clear breaking point. The number of requests for review have dramatically increased.\u00a0 The role of a managing editor or peer reviewer is more critical than ever before.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The irreplaceable impact of human judgement comes from experience and expertise along with wisdom.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>At the same time, the tools available to aid publishers, editors and peer reviewers are getting more and more sophisticated over time. The issue being faced with AI entering every realm in our lives and careers is that we run the risk of becoming over-reliant. We also cannot honestly keep pace with the sheer volumes of manuscripts being processed for peer review without embracing AI tools, can we? So truly, it is a conundrum that requires deliberation and debate.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>How much should we rely on tools?<\/li>\n<li>When is it ok to sit back and use one\u2019s own judgement?<\/li>\n<li>Is there a way to bring in new guidelines and alleviate the burden?<\/li>\n<li>Can (and should) we incentivize the efforts by all individuals involved?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Yesterday,<\/strong> journals were few and specialized to the field. Reviewers were truly peers \u2013 respected and renowned in the niche research area. You looked forward to (and dreaded) their feedback, read between the lines to guess who the reviewer might be, and even suggested names that should (or should not) review the paper. Yes, it was a small group who reviewed each other\u2019s work globally, and you wanted to get the highest quality feedback form reviewers who had your best interest in mind!<\/p>\n<p><strong>Today<\/strong>, emails pour in daily from \u201cActa artefacta\u201d which flood the inbox with requests to review as many papers as we can within &#8220;5 days.&#8221; In exchange the reviewer will be nominated to the Peer reviewer hall of fame. Ok this is a fictionalized scenario but the pain is real. Countless manuscripts pour into indexed journals, and editors need to continuously find peer reviewers. These \u201cpeers\u201d are none other than researchers, who themselves are already strapped for time, resources and funds. So they may agree, or may refuse. Even a reviewer who agrees may end up ghosting the editor eventually. So the editor must reach out to more researchers\u2026 and so on.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tomorrow<\/strong>, I dream of a day when the researcher will not need to wait for months wondering about their manuscript status while their research grows outdated or they get scooped. I imagine a scenario in which researchers who volunteer their time for peer review get credits that count towards their career progression. I envision a harmonious transition to a hybrid model of editorial-peer review workflow in which the time-consuming and labor-intensive steps of finding reviewers, fact-checking, communicating with all stakeholders becomes automated, leaving the experts to do what they are best at: unravel the science and move the field forward by using their knowledge where it is needed the most.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When a researcher wears an editor\u2019s hat As a scientist and researcher, one learns to question everything. As an editor, one must finally decide whether a paper is ready to move forward to publication or not. Having worn both hats for long stretches of my career, I have been able to see the researcher\u2019s perspective [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2830,"featured_media":38316,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5884,2390],"tags":[555,506],"new_categories":[],"new_tags":[2971,5763,5830,5869],"series":[],"class_list":["post-37568","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-academic-publishing-trends","category-journal-submission-peer-review","tag-medicine","tag-medicine-journal","new_tags-academic-publishing","new_tags-ai-for-researchers","new_tags-peer-review","new_tags-peer-review-week"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Yesterday, today, tomorrow- peer review from the editor&#039;s perspective | Editage Insights<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Yesterday, today, tomorrow- peer review from the editor&#039;s perspective | Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"When a researcher wears an editor\u2019s hat As a scientist and researcher, one learns to question everything. As an editor, one must finally decide whether a paper is ready to move forward to publication or not. Having worn both hats for long stretches of my career, I have been able to see the researcher\u2019s perspective [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-19T14:25:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-19T15:40:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/yDRpPEQouVOWg0nNWBoe-0-z9q4v.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Radhika Vaishnav\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Radhika Vaishnav\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Radhika Vaishnav\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/cfb91810fc32f1ddf3dafe11979983b2\"},\"headline\":\"Yesterday, today, tomorrow- peer review from the editor&#8217;s perspective\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-19T14:25:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-19T15:40:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers\"},\"wordCount\":575,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/yDRpPEQouVOWg0nNWBoe-0-z9q4v.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"Medicine\",\"Medicine journal\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Academic Publishing Trends\",\"Journal Submission &amp; Peer Review\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers\",\"name\":\"Yesterday, today, tomorrow- peer review from the editor's perspective | Editage Insights\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/yDRpPEQouVOWg0nNWBoe-0-z9q4v.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-19T14:25:51+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-19T15:40:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/yDRpPEQouVOWg0nNWBoe-0-z9q4v.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/yDRpPEQouVOWg0nNWBoe-0-z9q4v.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":1024},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Yesterday, today, tomorrow- peer review from the editor&#8217;s perspective\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":324,\"caption\":\"Editage Insights\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Editage\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/cfb91810fc32f1ddf3dafe11979983b2\",\"name\":\"Radhika Vaishnav\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b5e04fb73cbbddafa7669600f52347a55f84baac5963f042e31b4179a9f58d32?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b5e04fb73cbbddafa7669600f52347a55f84baac5963f042e31b4179a9f58d32?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Radhika Vaishnav\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/radhika-vaishnav-0\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Yesterday, today, tomorrow- peer review from the editor's perspective | Editage Insights","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Yesterday, today, tomorrow- peer review from the editor's perspective | Editage Insights","og_description":"When a researcher wears an editor\u2019s hat As a scientist and researcher, one learns to question everything. As an editor, one must finally decide whether a paper is ready to move forward to publication or not. Having worn both hats for long stretches of my career, I have been able to see the researcher\u2019s perspective [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers","og_site_name":"Editage Insights","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","article_published_time":"2025-09-19T14:25:51+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-19T15:40:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":1024,"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/yDRpPEQouVOWg0nNWBoe-0-z9q4v.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Radhika Vaishnav","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Editage","twitter_site":"@Editage","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Radhika Vaishnav","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers"},"author":{"name":"Radhika Vaishnav","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/cfb91810fc32f1ddf3dafe11979983b2"},"headline":"Yesterday, today, tomorrow- peer review from the editor&#8217;s perspective","datePublished":"2025-09-19T14:25:51+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-19T15:40:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers"},"wordCount":575,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/yDRpPEQouVOWg0nNWBoe-0-z9q4v.jpg","keywords":["Medicine","Medicine journal"],"articleSection":["Academic Publishing Trends","Journal Submission &amp; Peer Review"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers","name":"Yesterday, today, tomorrow- peer review from the editor's perspective | Editage Insights","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/yDRpPEQouVOWg0nNWBoe-0-z9q4v.jpg","datePublished":"2025-09-19T14:25:51+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-19T15:40:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/yDRpPEQouVOWg0nNWBoe-0-z9q4v.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/yDRpPEQouVOWg0nNWBoe-0-z9q4v.jpg","width":1024,"height":1024},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/yesterday-today-tomorrow-a-journey-through-the-eyes-of-peer-reviewers#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Yesterday, today, tomorrow- peer review from the editor&#8217;s perspective"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","name":"Editage Insights","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization","name":"Editage Insights","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":324,"caption":"Editage Insights"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","https:\/\/x.com\/Editage"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/cfb91810fc32f1ddf3dafe11979983b2","name":"Radhika Vaishnav","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b5e04fb73cbbddafa7669600f52347a55f84baac5963f042e31b4179a9f58d32?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b5e04fb73cbbddafa7669600f52347a55f84baac5963f042e31b4179a9f58d32?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Radhika Vaishnav"},"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/radhika-vaishnav-0"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37568","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2830"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37568"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37568\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/38316"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37568"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37568"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37568"},{"taxonomy":"new_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_categories?post=37568"},{"taxonomy":"new_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_tags?post=37568"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=37568"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}