{"id":568,"date":"2015-11-14T12:07:15","date_gmt":"2015-11-14T12:07:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report\/"},"modified":"2025-02-19T14:11:46","modified_gmt":"2025-02-19T14:11:46","slug":"how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report","title":{"rendered":"How authors, reviewers, and editors perceive peer review: An overview of the Taylor &#038; Francis report"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Peer review is considered by most scholars to be <a href=\"http:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/can-metrics-replace-peer-review-in-indicating-the-quality-impact-of-research\">a reliable method of evaluating research qualitatively<\/a>. Despite this, concerns have been raised from time to time about peer review, such as the biases in peer review, the efficacy of contemporary forms of peer review such as post-publication peer review, and so on. The viewpoints of authors, reviewers, and journal editors regarding peer review differ radically on many issues. Thus, to explore the global perceptions on peer review, Taylor &amp; Francis conducted one of the largest international research studies in 2015 and published the findings in the form of the report <a href=\"https:\/\/www.yumpu.com\/en\/document\/download\/55717484\/6cf03-20ef9-cf1d1-d1389-1028e-86fc8-4a83a-3edd8\">Peer Review in 2015 \u2013 A global view<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Taylor &amp; Francis study adds to the previously conducted studies on peer review \u2013 <a href=\"http:\/\/publishingresearchconsortium.com\/\">Publishing Research Consortium (PRC)<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.senseaboutscience.org\/\">Sense about Science<\/a> \u2013 to view any changes in the opinions of the major stakeholders of the peer review system.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Some of the <\/strong><a href=\"http:\/\/authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com\/peer-review-in-2015\/\"><strong>most important questions this study explores<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">What, according to today\u2019s researchers, is the purpose of peer review, and how is reality matching up to expectations?<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">How prevalent are ethical issues in peer review?<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">What is the view on the time taken to receive a report or review a paper?<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Is making the data behind the research available for review realistic, and how at ease are researchers with reviewing it?<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">How comfortable are authors, reviewers, and editors with different peer review models?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Facts about the report<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">Globally, 7438 individuals participated in the survey<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">The report focuses on six groups in UK, China, and South Africa<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\">The study covers sciences, social sciences, humanities, and medicine<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Key findings included in the report<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">1.\u00a0Echoing the findings from the previous studies, authors, editors, and reviewers all agreed that the most important motivation to publish in peer reviewed journals is making a contribution to the field and sharing research with others.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">2. There is a general agreement that, ideally, peer review should detect plagiarism.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">3. Researchers believed there was a low prevalence of gender bias but higher prevalence of regional and seniority bias \u2013 and suggested that double blind peer review is most capable of preventing reviewer discrimination.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">4. Most researchers have to wait between one and six months for an article they\u2019ve written to undergo peer review, but authors think up to two months is reasonable.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">5. Respondents are close to neutral on whether underlying data should be reviewed alongside the article. In the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.google.co.in\/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;cad=rja&amp;uact=8&amp;ved=0ahUKEwiC2unGr57JAhWUA44KHalZDCYQFgghMAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fpublishingresearchconsortium.com%2Findex.php%2Fprc-documents%2Fprc-research-projects%2F35-prc-summary-4-ware-final-1%2Ffile&amp;usg=AFQjCNELgoIZnj5MXgm0gmnG8OUyxPRl_g&amp;sig2=FA7KBlS39VCjwH-hOoB15g&amp;bvm=bv.108194040,d.c2E\">previous PRC study<\/a>, more respondents were supportive of the idea of reviewers reviewing author data.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">6. There are balanced views across the options of open, open and published, and post-publication review.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">7. Most researchers, across the humanities and social sciences (HSS) and science, technology, and medicine (STM), rate the benefit of the peer review process towards improving their article as 8 or above out of 10.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">8. Humanities and social sciences authors say they are kept less well-informed than STM authors about the progress of their article through peer review.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">9. While in an ideal world, it is desirable that reviewers provide polite feedback, highlight omissions, and suggest changes to improve readability, etc.; the respondents agree that the most achievable outcomes are reviewers checking methodology, determining the importance of findings, checking the relevance to journal scope, etc.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">10. Publication of articles from non-native English-speaking researchers is negatively impacted by grammatical and language issues. Thus, there is considerable editorial work involved in initial checking and processing of articles needing language or grammatical correction that may, or may not, reach review stage.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">The Taylor &amp; Francis report sheds light on the common goals of authors, reviewers, and editors to improve peer review in areas such as communication and timeliness. While the study provides a comprehensive and well-rounded perspective on peer review, <a href=\"http:\/\/scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org\/author\/pmd8\/\">Phil Davis<\/a> of Scholarly Kitchen points out a weakness in the study. According to him, \u201c[the weakness of] <a href=\"http:\/\/scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org\/2015\/10\/26\/what-do-authors-expect-from-peer-review-survey\/\">the T&amp;F study\u2013and others like it\u2013is that it treats peer review as a\u00a0<em>concept<\/em>, rather than a collection of diverse\u00a0tools used in a varied\u00a0set of situations for specific purposes.<\/a>\u201d He explains that rather than opting for an approach that quizzes the authors about \u201cWhat do authors expect from peer review?\u201d a more scientific approach that seeks answers to specific questions such as \u201cCan we identify specific problems and develop tools to solve them?\u201d would have assisted in delving into the problems surrounding peer review and resolving them. \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">It is evident that peer review continues to be considered one of the mainstays of scientific publication. The report sums up the study on peer review thus: \u201cOverall this study still found a fairly conservative researcher view, demonstrating a wish for tweaks to the current systems rather than a radically new way of assessing the quality and validity of research outputs.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Peer review is considered by most scholars to be a reliable method of evaluating research qualitatively. Despite this, concerns have been raised from time to time about peer review, such as the biases in peer review, the efficacy of contemporary forms of peer review such as post-publication peer review, and so on. The viewpoints of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":33313,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2405,2428],"tags":[539,2556,2654],"new_categories":[],"new_tags":[],"series":[],"class_list":["post-568","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-industry-trends","category-resources-for-editors-reviewers","tag-peer-review-process","tag-resources-for-editors","tag-resources-for-peer-reviewers"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>How authors, reviewers, and editors perceive peer review: An overview of the Taylor &amp; Francis report | Editage Insights<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Peer review is considered by most scholars to be a reliable method of evaluating research qualitatively. But what are the perspectives of authors, peer reivewers, and journal editors on peer review? Taylor &amp; Francis\u00a0conducted one of the largest international research studies in 2015 on this and published the findings in the form of the report Peer Review in 2015 \u2013 A global view.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How authors, reviewers, and editors perceive peer review: An overview of the Taylor &amp; Francis report | Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Peer review is considered by most scholars to be a reliable method of evaluating research qualitatively. But what are the perspectives of authors, peer reivewers, and journal editors on peer review? Taylor &amp; Francis\u00a0conducted one of the largest international research studies in 2015 on this and published the findings in the form of the report Peer Review in 2015 \u2013 A global view.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-11-14T12:07:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-02-19T14:11:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/How-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-An-overview-of-the-Taylor-Francis-report-resized_0.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"656\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"336\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sneha Kulkarni\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sneha Kulkarni\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Sneha Kulkarni\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d\"},\"headline\":\"How authors, reviewers, and editors perceive peer review: An overview of the Taylor &#038; Francis report\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-14T12:07:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-19T14:11:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report\"},\"wordCount\":790,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"peer review process\",\"Resources for Editors\",\"Resources for Peer Reviewers\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Industry Trends\",\"Resources for Editors\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report\",\"name\":\"How authors, reviewers, and editors perceive peer review: An overview of the Taylor & Francis report | Editage Insights\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-11-14T12:07:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-02-19T14:11:46+00:00\",\"description\":\"Peer review is considered by most scholars to be a reliable method of evaluating research qualitatively. But what are the perspectives of authors, peer reivewers, and journal editors on peer review? Taylor & Francis\u00a0conducted one of the largest international research studies in 2015 on this and published the findings in the form of the report Peer Review in 2015 \u2013 A global view.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"width\":656,\"height\":336},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How authors, reviewers, and editors perceive peer review: An overview of the Taylor &#038; Francis report\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":324,\"caption\":\"Editage Insights\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Editage\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d\",\"name\":\"Sneha Kulkarni\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Sneha Kulkarni\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/sneha-kulkarni\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How authors, reviewers, and editors perceive peer review: An overview of the Taylor & Francis report | Editage Insights","description":"Peer review is considered by most scholars to be a reliable method of evaluating research qualitatively. But what are the perspectives of authors, peer reivewers, and journal editors on peer review? Taylor & Francis\u00a0conducted one of the largest international research studies in 2015 on this and published the findings in the form of the report Peer Review in 2015 \u2013 A global view.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How authors, reviewers, and editors perceive peer review: An overview of the Taylor & Francis report | Editage Insights","og_description":"Peer review is considered by most scholars to be a reliable method of evaluating research qualitatively. But what are the perspectives of authors, peer reivewers, and journal editors on peer review? Taylor & Francis\u00a0conducted one of the largest international research studies in 2015 on this and published the findings in the form of the report Peer Review in 2015 \u2013 A global view.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report","og_site_name":"Editage Insights","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","article_published_time":"2015-11-14T12:07:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-02-19T14:11:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":656,"height":336,"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/How-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-An-overview-of-the-Taylor-Francis-report-resized_0.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sneha Kulkarni","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Editage","twitter_site":"@Editage","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sneha Kulkarni","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report"},"author":{"name":"Sneha Kulkarni","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d"},"headline":"How authors, reviewers, and editors perceive peer review: An overview of the Taylor &#038; Francis report","datePublished":"2015-11-14T12:07:15+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-19T14:11:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report"},"wordCount":790,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","keywords":["peer review process","Resources for Editors","Resources for Peer Reviewers"],"articleSection":["Industry Trends","Resources for Editors"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report","name":"How authors, reviewers, and editors perceive peer review: An overview of the Taylor & Francis report | Editage Insights","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","datePublished":"2015-11-14T12:07:15+00:00","dateModified":"2025-02-19T14:11:46+00:00","description":"Peer review is considered by most scholars to be a reliable method of evaluating research qualitatively. But what are the perspectives of authors, peer reivewers, and journal editors on peer review? Taylor & Francis\u00a0conducted one of the largest international research studies in 2015 on this and published the findings in the form of the report Peer Review in 2015 \u2013 A global view.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","width":656,"height":336},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-authors-reviewers-and-editors-perceive-peer-review-an-overview-of-the-taylor-francis-report#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How authors, reviewers, and editors perceive peer review: An overview of the Taylor &#038; Francis report"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","name":"Editage Insights","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization","name":"Editage Insights","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":324,"caption":"Editage Insights"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","https:\/\/x.com\/Editage"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/7c95168c8a381719f987ecc0eb49d20d","name":"Sneha Kulkarni","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/bb54352821d99f6174b14235a21b38dafe7a9649e6f269e8abd97284e09ad189?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sneha Kulkarni"},"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/sneha-kulkarni"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/568","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=568"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/568\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=568"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=568"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=568"},{"taxonomy":"new_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_categories?post=568"},{"taxonomy":"new_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_tags?post=568"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=568"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}