
{"id":847,"date":"2017-09-12T04:55:28","date_gmt":"2017-09-12T04:55:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor\/"},"modified":"2025-01-15T06:38:48","modified_gmt":"2025-01-15T06:38:48","slug":"how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor","title":{"rendered":"How to select peer reviewers: Advice from an expert journal editor"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><em>Editor\u2019s Note: This post was originally published in 2014 and has been refreshed for Peer Review Week 2017.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;\">In the previous part of <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/series\/a-manuscript%E2%80%99s-journey-from-an-editor%E2%80%99s-perspective\" style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;\">this series<\/a><span style=\"font-family: verdana, geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;\">, I gave a broad overview of the Associate Editor\u2019s (AE\u2019s) responsibilities, and went on to describe the process of how an AE is assigned and how the AE reads and assesses the manuscript to decide whether to send it for peer review.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\">In this post, I will describe how, as an AE, I proceed once I decide to send a manuscript out for peer review. My tasks at this stage include selecting potential peer reviewers and sending out review invitations, identifying more reviewers in case the invitations are rejected, repeating the process till an adequate number of reviewers have accepted the invitations. I hope this post enables you to get a glimpse at academic publishing from the perspective of journal editors and their task of reviewer selection.\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><strong><u>Picking reviewers<\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\">Once I get an overview of a manuscript and decide to send it for peer review, my next step is to identify a set of potential reviewers to invite. I think about the paper as I understand it, and which researchers are active in that area or related areas. I cast my mind over papers I have read, presentations I have seen, and conversations I have had, to identify who is a suitable expert on the topic. There doesn\u2019t have to be an exact match \u2013 perhaps the application is unusual, but the potential reviewer might have used similar techniques.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\">I also draw ideas for reviewers from the paper. Does the paper make extensive reference to some prior work? Does it compare to a method described in a previous paper? Then there is a good chance that I will invite the authors of these papers (assuming that they do not overlap with the authors of the current submission) to perform the review. I may do some speculative searching \u2013 are there keywords or problem descriptions from the paper that I can find other papers about online? In particular, I check if I can find papers on similar topics published in the same journal \u2013 since I feel the authors of those works owe a review back to the journal.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\">After brainstorming for a while, I usually have a list of half a dozen potential reviewers. I do some additional research on them to ensure that they are well-placed to help. Before inviting each reviewer, I check their website, if they have one. I look at the titles and venues of their papers, and years in which they have been active in this area, and also descriptions of their current role and activities.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\">Apart from their expertise, I consider a couple of other points when picking a reviewer. You might be able to draw some tips from these considerations:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><em>Do they have other commitments?<\/em><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\">I tend to avoid asking people who indicate that they are the head of a large research group, chair of their department, and active in running a start-up at the same time. Such people tend to be too busy to perform reviewing tasks. Advanced graduate students can be a good fit because they know their focus area very well, they are likely to be interested in becoming peer reviewers, and have very few other pressing demands on their time; however, it is sometimes hard to tell which students are mature enough in their area without a personal recommendation. So the bulk of reviewing falls upon faculty and researchers who don\u2019t appear too busy, or don\u2019t yet realize how busy they are.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\">I avoid asking EiCs and AEs of any journal to perform a review: they are usually far too occupied with the submissions for their own journal. In particular, I avoid asking an AE from the same journal to assist.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><em>Are they still active in the field?<\/em><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\">The editors&#8217; curse is to find someone who has worked on some highly related topics, only to discover that their last publication was in 1999. Usually this means that they have left research for another career, retired, or abandoned this area of study. In some cases, I identify a reviewer who would be perfect to help with a paper, only to discover that they are no longer alive!Following this analysis of reviewers, I pick a shortlist of 3 or 4, and start to send out invitations. Some journals typically have a default invitation template describing the expectations. I personalize this invitation, to give some indication of why I have invited the reviewer: for example, because I think the submission relates to their expertise on a topic. My hope is that this personal touch will make them more likely to accept the invitation. The invitation can also indicate if the paper is a resubmission, an invited submission or an extended version of a conference paper.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\">I might include the submitted manuscript with the invitation. When I am invited to review, I often find it helpful to quickly scan the submission, to determine how relevant it is and how much effort it will be. When suitable, I like to give other reviewers this opportunity. However, I must admit, when a paper seems particularly long and technically dense, I may avoid sending it, for fear of scaring off the potential reviewer.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><strong><u>Dealing with declined invitations<\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\">Inevitably, some invitations to review will be met with rejection. Indeed, in my experience about half of responses are negative. This can be for many reasons, of varying validity: the invitee is too busy, does not consider themselves an expert on the subject matter, does not find the paper interesting, or just doesn\u2019t feel like it on the day. A negative response does not annoy me (unless I feel that the paper really was spot-on for the reviewer). What does irk me are two things:<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><em>Tardiness<\/em> \u2013 It should not take a long time to respond to a review request. If people are actively at work, I would hope to hear a reply within a couple of days; if traveling or otherwise tied-up, I would still hope to hear within a week or so. It pains me when an invitee sits on a request for weeks, and then declines (possibly only after a reminder). Even when the invitation is accepted after a long pause, this can be a troubling sign, as it indicates that the review itself may be similarly delayed.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><em>Lack of alternative suggestions<\/em> \u2013 My favourite type of response is actually a very fast negative response that comes with a list of suggested alternate reviewers. This means that the invitee has thought about the invitation, understands that they are unable to commit to it, but has considered it enough to come up with a list of others who may be able to help. This is particularly valuable when the area of the submission is less familiar to me. As a reviewer, I suggest alternates when I am unable to assist \u2013 unless I really don\u2019t know the topic. As a result, when a subject matter expert declines, I often follow up with an email pushing for some suggested alternate reviewers. I encourage people to feel obliged to provide alternates when declining an invitation.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><strong><u>Selecting additional reviewers<\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\">When reviewers decline an invitation, I need to find more reviewers to invite. Sometimes I have some back-ups already picked, or can take advantage of suggestions from those who have declined. I avoid having more than four \u201cactive\u201d invitations at one time, in case all reviewers accept: it is redundant to have a large number for one paper. Often though, I need to find some new candidates. This is perhaps the toughest part of the job, as it means further head scratching to come up with good candidates. It is quite dispiriting when a large number of reviewers have declined to review a paper. The worst case is when the paper is quite specialized, and all the natural candidates have been tapped. It is particularly galling when, after prompting for other reviewers, the suggestions consist of candidates who have already declined. At this stage, the AE can feel that the task of finding enough suitable experts to evaluate a paper may be impossible. However, with persistence, enough reviewers will eventually agree.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><strong><u>Achieving acceptance from reviewers<\/u><\/strong><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\">When sufficient reviewers have agreed to review a paper (usually three or four), and dates for the review have been agreed upon, the initial phase of the process is complete. I can sit back, relax, and wait for the reviews to arrive.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\">The next part of this series will deal with what happens once the reviews come in and how a final decision on the manuscript is reached.<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span style=\"font-size:14px;\"><span style=\"font-family:verdana,geneva,sans-serif;\"><em>This post is a modified version of the article\u00a0<\/em><em><a href=\"https:\/\/pdfs.semanticscholar.org\/39d0\/8632acaef057fe4ddda26971e1c4d5149659.pdf\">What does an Associate Editor actually do?<\/a>\u00a0<\/em><em>originally published on the website of the Association for Computing Machinery, Special Interest Group On Management of Data<\/em><em>.<\/em><em>This post has been modified and republished with the permission of the author, and is the second part of a series. Stay tuned for the next segment of this series.<\/em><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Editor\u2019s Note: This post was originally published in 2014 and has been refreshed for Peer Review Week 2017. In the previous part of this series, I gave a broad overview of the Associate Editor\u2019s (AE\u2019s) responsibilities, and went on to describe the process of how an AE is assigned and how the AE reads and [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":85,"featured_media":33313,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2394],"tags":[539,1060],"new_categories":[],"new_tags":[],"series":[2822],"class_list":["post-847","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-basics-of-peer-review","tag-peer-review-process","tag-selecting-peer-reviewers","series-a-manuscripts-journey-from-an-editors-perspective"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Behind the scenes: How a journal editor selects peer reviewers | Editage Insights<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"In this article, an experienced journal editor reveals how he selects peer reviewers, shares the challenges in getting a suitable reviewer to accept the invitation.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Behind the scenes: How a journal editor selects peer reviewers | Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In this article, an experienced journal editor reveals how he selects peer reviewers, shares the challenges in getting a suitable reviewer to accept the invitation.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-09-12T04:55:28+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-01-15T06:38:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor_0.jpeg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"656\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"336\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Graham Cormode\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Graham Cormode\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Graham Cormode\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/4a784666f073930a9f642fe7755ece05\"},\"headline\":\"How to select peer reviewers: Advice from an expert journal editor\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-12T04:55:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-15T06:38:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor\"},\"wordCount\":1520,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"keywords\":[\"peer review process\",\"selecting peer reviewers\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Basics of Peer Review\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor\",\"name\":\"Behind the scenes: How a journal editor selects peer reviewers | Editage Insights\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-12T04:55:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-01-15T06:38:48+00:00\",\"description\":\"In this article, an experienced journal editor reveals how he selects peer reviewers, shares the challenges in getting a suitable reviewer to accept the invitation.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"width\":656,\"height\":336},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"How to select peer reviewers: Advice from an expert journal editor\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":324,\"caption\":\"Editage Insights\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Editage\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/4a784666f073930a9f642fe7755ece05\",\"name\":\"Graham Cormode\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/af7ab7d54c46a395625f2f752fdf3b678bf10cfd3df4b70f96d477d1641c42dc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/af7ab7d54c46a395625f2f752fdf3b678bf10cfd3df4b70f96d477d1641c42dc?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Graham Cormode\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/graham-cormode\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Behind the scenes: How a journal editor selects peer reviewers | Editage Insights","description":"In this article, an experienced journal editor reveals how he selects peer reviewers, shares the challenges in getting a suitable reviewer to accept the invitation.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Behind the scenes: How a journal editor selects peer reviewers | Editage Insights","og_description":"In this article, an experienced journal editor reveals how he selects peer reviewers, shares the challenges in getting a suitable reviewer to accept the invitation.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor","og_site_name":"Editage Insights","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","article_published_time":"2017-09-12T04:55:28+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-01-15T06:38:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":656,"height":336,"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/09\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor_0.jpeg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Graham Cormode","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@Editage","twitter_site":"@Editage","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Graham Cormode","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor"},"author":{"name":"Graham Cormode","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/4a784666f073930a9f642fe7755ece05"},"headline":"How to select peer reviewers: Advice from an expert journal editor","datePublished":"2017-09-12T04:55:28+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-15T06:38:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor"},"wordCount":1520,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","keywords":["peer review process","selecting peer reviewers"],"articleSection":["Basics of Peer Review"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor","name":"Behind the scenes: How a journal editor selects peer reviewers | Editage Insights","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","datePublished":"2017-09-12T04:55:28+00:00","dateModified":"2025-01-15T06:38:48+00:00","description":"In this article, an experienced journal editor reveals how he selects peer reviewers, shares the challenges in getting a suitable reviewer to accept the invitation.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","width":656,"height":336},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-select-peer-reviewers-advice-from-an-expert-journal-editor#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"How to select peer reviewers: Advice from an expert journal editor"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","name":"Editage Insights","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization","name":"Editage Insights","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":324,"caption":"Editage Insights"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","https:\/\/x.com\/Editage"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/4a784666f073930a9f642fe7755ece05","name":"Graham Cormode","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/af7ab7d54c46a395625f2f752fdf3b678bf10cfd3df4b70f96d477d1641c42dc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/af7ab7d54c46a395625f2f752fdf3b678bf10cfd3df4b70f96d477d1641c42dc?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Graham Cormode"},"url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/graham-cormode"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/847","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/85"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=847"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/847\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=847"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=847"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=847"},{"taxonomy":"new_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_categories?post=847"},{"taxonomy":"new_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_tags?post=847"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=847"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}