
{"id":8450,"date":"2017-09-29T07:35:02","date_gmt":"2017-09-29T07:35:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/q_and_a\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-or-negative-comments-by-the-third-reviewer\/"},"modified":"2025-04-04T12:14:55","modified_gmt":"2025-04-04T12:14:55","slug":"how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer","status":"publish","type":"q_and_a","link":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer","title":{"rendered":"How to deal with harsh or negative comments by the third reviewer?"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":315,"featured_media":33313,"template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"inline_featured_image":false},"categories":[2429],"new_categories":[],"new_tags":[],"series":[],"class_list":["post-8450","q_and_a","type-q_and_a","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-responding-to-peer-reviewers"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>How to deal with harsh or negative comments by the third reviewer? | Editage Insights<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"I submitted a paper to a reputed journal (Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences) and after two months I received an editorial decision of Major Revision. In that case, three reviewers were invited and out of those, two gave positive reviews whereas the other review was negative and possibly recommended rejection. Anyways, I made the revisions and addressed the concerns of the reviewers and resubmitted the manuscript. After two months, I received a Major revision decison once again. This time the editor had sent the paper to three reviewers again and the opinions were split. Two reviewers again gave positive comments and recommended that the article can be published after some minor revisions. The third reviewer&#039;s comments were extremely nasty and suggested rejection straightaway. Now I am confused what to do? Is this is a sign of eventual rejection, even though the editor has given it Major Revision? I do not even know, how much importance the editor has given to the nasty comments by the Third Reviewer and also how should I respond to those nasty comments? I would be very grateful if the experts here help me out with this.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"How to deal with harsh or negative comments by the third reviewer? | Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"I submitted a paper to a reputed journal (Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences) and after two months I received an editorial decision of Major Revision. In that case, three reviewers were invited and out of those, two gave positive reviews whereas the other review was negative and possibly recommended rejection. Anyways, I made the revisions and addressed the concerns of the reviewers and resubmitted the manuscript. After two months, I received a Major revision decison once again. This time the editor had sent the paper to three reviewers again and the opinions were split. Two reviewers again gave positive comments and recommended that the article can be published after some minor revisions. The third reviewer&#039;s comments were extremely nasty and suggested rejection straightaway. Now I am confused what to do? Is this is a sign of eventual rejection, even though the editor has given it Major Revision? I do not even know, how much importance the editor has given to the nasty comments by the Third Reviewer and also how should I respond to those nasty comments? I would be very grateful if the experts here help me out with this.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Editage Insights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-04-04T12:14:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Editage\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer\",\"name\":\"How to deal with harsh or negative comments by the third reviewer? | Editage Insights\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-09-29T07:35:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-04-04T12:14:55+00:00\",\"description\":\"I submitted a paper to a reputed journal (Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences) and after two months I received an editorial decision of Major Revision. In that case, three reviewers were invited and out of those, two gave positive reviews whereas the other review was negative and possibly recommended rejection. Anyways, I made the revisions and addressed the concerns of the reviewers and resubmitted the manuscript. After two months, I received a Major revision decison once again. This time the editor had sent the paper to three reviewers again and the opinions were split. Two reviewers again gave positive comments and recommended that the article can be published after some minor revisions. The third reviewer's comments were extremely nasty and suggested rejection straightaway. Now I am confused what to do? Is this is a sign of eventual rejection, even though the editor has given it Major Revision? I do not even know, how much importance the editor has given to the nasty comments by the Third Reviewer and also how should I respond to those nasty comments? I would be very grateful if the experts here help me out with this.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp\",\"width\":656,\"height\":336},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Q&amp;A Forums\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/q_and_a\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"How to deal with harsh or negative comments by the third reviewer?\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Editage Insights\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp\",\"width\":2560,\"height\":324,\"caption\":\"Editage Insights\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Editage\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"How to deal with harsh or negative comments by the third reviewer? | Editage Insights","description":"I submitted a paper to a reputed journal (Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences) and after two months I received an editorial decision of Major Revision. In that case, three reviewers were invited and out of those, two gave positive reviews whereas the other review was negative and possibly recommended rejection. Anyways, I made the revisions and addressed the concerns of the reviewers and resubmitted the manuscript. After two months, I received a Major revision decison once again. This time the editor had sent the paper to three reviewers again and the opinions were split. Two reviewers again gave positive comments and recommended that the article can be published after some minor revisions. The third reviewer's comments were extremely nasty and suggested rejection straightaway. Now I am confused what to do? Is this is a sign of eventual rejection, even though the editor has given it Major Revision? I do not even know, how much importance the editor has given to the nasty comments by the Third Reviewer and also how should I respond to those nasty comments? I would be very grateful if the experts here help me out with this.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"How to deal with harsh or negative comments by the third reviewer? | Editage Insights","og_description":"I submitted a paper to a reputed journal (Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences) and after two months I received an editorial decision of Major Revision. In that case, three reviewers were invited and out of those, two gave positive reviews whereas the other review was negative and possibly recommended rejection. Anyways, I made the revisions and addressed the concerns of the reviewers and resubmitted the manuscript. After two months, I received a Major revision decison once again. This time the editor had sent the paper to three reviewers again and the opinions were split. Two reviewers again gave positive comments and recommended that the article can be published after some minor revisions. The third reviewer's comments were extremely nasty and suggested rejection straightaway. Now I am confused what to do? Is this is a sign of eventual rejection, even though the editor has given it Major Revision? I do not even know, how much importance the editor has given to the nasty comments by the Third Reviewer and also how should I respond to those nasty comments? I would be very grateful if the experts here help me out with this.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer","og_site_name":"Editage Insights","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","article_modified_time":"2025-04-04T12:14:55+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_site":"@Editage","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer","name":"How to deal with harsh or negative comments by the third reviewer? | Editage Insights","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","datePublished":"2017-09-29T07:35:02+00:00","dateModified":"2025-04-04T12:14:55+00:00","description":"I submitted a paper to a reputed journal (Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences) and after two months I received an editorial decision of Major Revision. In that case, three reviewers were invited and out of those, two gave positive reviews whereas the other review was negative and possibly recommended rejection. Anyways, I made the revisions and addressed the concerns of the reviewers and resubmitted the manuscript. After two months, I received a Major revision decison once again. This time the editor had sent the paper to three reviewers again and the opinions were split. Two reviewers again gave positive comments and recommended that the article can be published after some minor revisions. The third reviewer's comments were extremely nasty and suggested rejection straightaway. Now I am confused what to do? Is this is a sign of eventual rejection, even though the editor has given it Major Revision? I do not even know, how much importance the editor has given to the nasty comments by the Third Reviewer and also how should I respond to those nasty comments? I would be very grateful if the experts here help me out with this.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/editage-insights-generic-banner_298.webp","width":656,"height":336},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/how-to-deal-with-harsh-comments-by-the-third-reviewer#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Q&amp;A Forums","item":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/q_and_a"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"How to deal with harsh or negative comments by the third reviewer?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","name":"Editage Insights","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#organization","name":"Editage Insights","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/editage-insights-logo-1-scaled.webp","width":2560,"height":324,"caption":"Editage Insights"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/Editage","https:\/\/x.com\/Editage"]}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/q_and_a\/8450","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/q_and_a"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/q_and_a"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/315"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/q_and_a\/8450\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/33313"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8450"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8450"},{"taxonomy":"new_categories","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_categories?post=8450"},{"taxonomy":"new_tags","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/new_tags?post=8450"},{"taxonomy":"series","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.editage.com\/insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/series?post=8450"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}