Earlier in May, Sneha Kulkarni, Senior Writer & Editor, Editage Insights, attended the 39th annual meeting of Society for Scholarly Publishing in Boston, USA, accompanied by Nikesh Gosalia, Director, Academic and Publisher Relations, Editage, and Donald Samulack, President, US Operations, Editage. This is Sneha's personal account of the three-day event.
I attended the 39th annual meeting of Society for Scholarly Publishing held in the beautiful and culturally rich city of Boston, Massachusetts, from May 31 to June 3, 2017. This year’s theme was extremely relevant to the current discussions in the scholarly community: “Striking a Balance: Embracing Change While Preserving Tradition in Scholarly Communications.” As a first-time attendee, I was excited to be a part one of the biggest conferences (with more than 1000 participants) that included several insightful plenary discussions, informative sessions by the sponsors, ample opportunities to network, and an exhibitor marketplace that would acquaint me with innovative products and services. Editage was one of the sponsors of the conference, and we had a booth in the exhibitors’ marketplace. We also hosted a session to share the preliminary results of a large-scale survey we conducted this year to understand author perspectives on publication process.
May 31 kicked off with concurrent pre-meeting seminars that promised to set the tone for the rest of the conference. These sessions ranged a broad spectrum of interesting topics, which included interesting issues such as discoverability of content, how publishers manage difficult editorial situations, how publishers and librarians are dealing with the problem of predation and piracy, and many more.
Since the sessions were concurrent, I could only attend one of them and that was a tough choice to make! I chose to attend “Predators, “pirates” and privacy: Publishers and librarians explore new challenges in scholarly communications” because I was keen on understanding the current and upcoming trends in data and content protection. I was thrilled to be meeting the esteemed panelists, which included David Crotty, Oxford University Press; Michael Levine-Clark, University of Denver; Kathleen Berryman, Cabell’s International among others. Some of the topics discussed were the increased usage of Sci-Hub, what motivated users to look up to pirated sources for information, and the need to promote the importance of accessing content through authentic channels.
This session was followed by a lunch, which allowed for a lot of interaction. Soon after this, the sessions by the sponsors commenced. I attended a session by Cabell’s Anaytics’ titled “Quality vs legitimacy.” Soon after this, Donald Samulack, President of the U.S. Operations for Editage/Cactus Communications, presented a session “Helping publishers get closer to authors: Perspectives from a global survey of academic authors” in which he discussed the author perspectives on various aspects of journal publishing, such as journal communication, time to publication, publication ethics, and open access based on a survey by Editage in which more than 5000 respondents had shared their opinion. The anticipation to be privy to the survey results was high among the attendees, and the session was well-attended.
Some of the interesting outcomes that Donald discussed were:
Here are some of the tweets that capture the events and discussions of the day:
The stimulating first day of the conference ended on a high note with an opening reception which was rich with discussions of the day’s events. It definitely set a great tone for the upcoming days of the conference. Although I felt tired at the end of the day, I was already looking forward to the next day.
Please check this space for the next part of the report in which I report the events from the next two days.