Editage Insights Editage Insights
Log In/Register Submit Enquiry
Editage Insights
  • Publication Success
    • Academic Editing Services
    • Publication Support Services
    • Translation Services
    • Statistical Analysis and Review Services
  • Research Journey
    • Conducting Research
      • Research Data Management
      • Publication Planning
    • Manuscript Writing
      • Academic Writing
      • Research Paper Structure
    • Journal Selection
      • Choosing a Journal
      • Publication Models
    • Journal Submission & Peer Review
      • Manuscript Submission
      • Tracking Your Submission
      • Journal Rejection
      • Journal Retraction
  • Career Growth
    • Securing Research Funding
      • Funding Sources
      • Grant Application
    • Science Communication
      • Public Engagement
      • Plain Language Summaries
      • Video & Graphical Abstracts
      • Promoting your Research
    • Professional Development
      • Collaboration and networking
      • Presentation skills
      • Project Management
    • Career Advancement
      • Becoming a Peer Reviewer
      • Career Advice for Researchers
  • Mental Health
    • Mental Health in Academia
      • Research Culture
      • Researcher Wellness
    • Stories by Researchers
  • Q & A
  • Training Resources
    • WEBINARS & WORKSHOPS
    • Downloadables
  • Industry Outlook
    • AI & Digital Transformation
    • Maximizing Impact
    • Research Integrity
    • Researcher Engagement
    • Trends in Scholarly Publishing
  • Submit Enquiry
  1. Home
  2. Research Ethics
  3. Case study: The…

Case study: The need for informed consent

This article is in
  • Research Ethics

  • Satyajit Rout
  • Satyajit Rout

    Jun 13, 2014

Reading time
1 min
 Case study: The need for informed consent

Case: The study proposed a new wound healing technique and involved needle puncture on patients from two medical centers. It was mentioned in the paper that an institutional ethical review board has given ethical approval for the study. However, the process of puncturing, healing, and cleaning the vascular access was done without informed consent.

Action: On being informed of the need for patient consent, the authors asked if they could correct the situation by obtaining informed consent retrospectively. Our expert explained to the authors that journals would have an issue with human experimentation conducted without active consent of the subjects and that this requirement ought to be fulfilled before experimentation. The authors did not know about this and thanked us. They informed us that they would conduct the experiments involving invasive procedures once again, this time with prior informed consent from the patients.

Summary: Informed consent involves clearly explaining the procedures, risks, and benefits of the medical tests performed on the patients and taking their freely given consent, preferably in written form. Any study on patients, patient groups, and/or volunteer participants requires informed consent, which must be documented in the paper before submission to a journal. This is a non-negotiable ethical requirement of human experimentation. As per research protocol, journals should specify the requirement for informed consent in their instructions for authors, and published articles should indicate that informed consent has been obtained. In most cases, peer reviewers or ethical review committee members raise the alarm if the informed consent forms are missing or inadequate. Many reputed journals would reject a manuscript if it does not contain proper documentation of informed consent. Universities and journals should make authors aware of all ethical requirements of scientific research so that their work is not rendered ineligible for publication because of an ethical lapse.

Author

Satyajit Rout

Experienced editor and scholarly publishing professional passionate about enabling effective science communication.

See more from Satyajit Rout

Found this useful?

If so, share it with your fellow researchers

View Comments

Related post

China tightens rules for genetic research
Research Ethics

China tightens rules for genetic research

April 19, 2022
Ethical declarations that authors should provide at the journal submission stage
Ethical Declarations

Ethical declarations that authors should provide at...

September 18, 2018
Compliance to guidelines in reporting animal research: A case study
Research Ethics

Compliance to guidelines in reporting animal research:...

June 1, 2016
China tightens rules for genetic research
Research Ethics

China tightens rules for genetic research

April 19, 2022
Ethical declarations that authors should provide at the journal submission stage
Ethical Declarations

Ethical declarations that authors should provide at...

September 18, 2018
Compliance to guidelines in reporting animal research: A case study
Research Ethics

Compliance to guidelines in reporting animal research:...

June 1, 2016
China tightens rules for genetic research
Research Ethics

China tightens rules for genetic research

April 19, 2022
Ethical declarations that authors should provide at the journal submission stage
Ethical Declarations

Ethical declarations that authors should provide at...

September 18, 2018
Compliance to guidelines in reporting animal research: A case study
Research Ethics

Compliance to guidelines in reporting animal research:...

June 1, 2016

Related Reading

  • Research integrity: what do international guidelines say?

  • What is Academic Integrity? Our Top Resources for Researchers

    Integrity, academic integrity depicted visually
  • Highlights from Peer Review Week 2022 Day 1: Perspectives on research integrity shared by Elizabeth Bik and Mike Streeter

    Highlights from Peer Review Week 2022 Day 1: Perspectives on research integrity shared by Elizabeth Bik and Mike Streeter
  • Developments in research misconduct—What peer reviewers need to know in 2022 and beyond

    Developments in research misconduct—What peer reviewers need to know in 2022 and beyond
  • The ICMJE recommendations on AI: Advice for authors and peer reviewers

About Editage Insights

Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more.

More

Quality

  • Confidentiality
  • Publication Ethics
  • Quality Assurance
  • Testimonials

Editage

  • About Editage
  • Payment Options
  • Prices for Editing
  • Terms of Use

More

  • Contribute as a Guest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us

Publication Support Services

  • Artwork Preparation
  • Journal Selection
  • Journal Submission
  • Plagiarism Check
  • Publication Support Packs
  • Rapid Technical Review
  • Resubmission Support
  • Statistical Analysis and Review

Our Expertise

  • Business and Economics
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Sciences
  • Physical Sciences
  • Social Sciences

FOLLOW ON SOCIAL PLATFORMS

Editage Insights Global Sites

Japanese – エディテージ・インサイト

Simplified Chinese – 意得辑专家视点

Korean - 에디티지 인사이트

Editing Services

  • Advanced Editing
  • Digital Editing
  • English Editing Services
  • Post-Editing Services
  • Premium Editing
  • Scientific Editing

Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. English Editing - Editage.com | 英文校正 – Editage.jp | 원어민영문교정 – Editage.co.kr | SCI英文论文发表 – Editage.cn | publicação de artigos – Editage.com.br | 編輯英文 – Editage.com.tw

Copyright 2025 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Careers

Filter by a topic

or Select all topics
x
  • Books & Tools
  • Career Growth
    • Career Advancement
      • Becoming a Peer Reviewer
      • Career Advice for Researchers
    • Professional Development
      • Collaboration and networking
      • Presentation skills
      • Project Management
    • Science Communication
      • Plain Language Summaries
      • Promoting your Research
      • Public Engagement
      • Video & Graphical Abstracts
    • Securing Research Funding
      • Funding Sources
      • Grant Application
  • Conducting Research
    • Publication Planning
      • Authorship in Research
      • Literature Search
      • Planning to Write
      • Research Ethics
      • Statement of the Problem
    • Research Data Management
      • Data Analysis
      • Data Storage & Management
  • Industry Outlook
    • AI & Digital Transformation
    • Maximizing Impact
    • Research Integrity
    • Researcher Engagement
    • Trends in Scholarly Publishing
  • Journal Selection
    • Choosing a Journal
      • Journal Selection Tips
      • Presubmission Inquiry
      • Understanding the Impact Factor
    • Publication Models
      • Avoiding Predatory Publishers
      • Open Access & Subscription Models
      • Rapid Publication
  • Journal Submission & Peer Review
    • Journal Rejection
      • Dealing with Rejection
      • Reasons for Rejection
    • Journal Retraction
      • Dealing with Retraction
      • Reasons for Retraction
    • Manuscript Submission
      • Duplicate Submission
      • Ethical Declarations
      • Submission Process
    • Responding to Peer Reviewers
      • Basics of Peer Review
      • Responding to Peer Reviewers
    • Tracking Your Submission
      • Manuscript Status
      • Manuscript Withdrawal
      • Queries to the Editor
  • Manuscript Writing
    • Academic Writing
      • Grammar & Language
      • Plagiarism in Research
      • Style & Format
    • Research Paper Structure
      • Methods
      • Publication Support Services
      • References & Acknowledgements
      • Results & Discussion
      • Study Background & Introduction
      • Tables & Figures
      • Title, Abstract & keywords
  • Mental Health
    • Mental Health in Academia
      • Research Culture
      • Researcher Wellness
  • More
    • News & Trends
      • COVID-19
      • Industry Interviews
      • Industry News
      • Industry Trends
      • Peer Review Week 2020
      • Trending Research
    • Recommended Reads
      • Around the web
      • Our Publication Showcase
      • Resources for Editors
  • Researchers and Their Stories
  • Showcasing Research Impact

Notifications