Articles
Responding to Peer Reviewers
The proportion of authors from non-traditional research-producing countries has substantially increased in the past few years, but the increase in proportion of peer…
- Mriganka Awati
- September 24, 2021
After my first year as an academic editor at PLOS One, I’ve learned a lot about the peer review process, including what happens to my own papers when I submit them for…
- Dr. Manu Saunders
- September 16, 2019
This article explores the various views around using ChatGPT or any other LLM as a peer reviewing tool.
- Marisha Fonseca
- June 23, 2023
In this article, we will provide a step-by-step guide to help researchers better understand and navigate the peer review process.
- Editage Insights
- July 3, 2023
In this article, we provide an overview of the possibilities and concerns of using AI in peer review and how best AI can come together with human expertise.
- Sunaina Singh
- September 25, 2023
How you address your peer review comments may influence the editors’ decision of whether to accept or reject your manuscript. Thus, it’s important to address peer review…
- Editage Insights
- December 22, 2021
What do authors think about peer review? Do they think it's working? What changes do they want to see in peer review? And how can peer review quality be improved? Read…
- Editage Insights
- September 16, 2019
Download this handbook to learn 7 ways to make your peer reviewer happy.
- Editage Insights
- September 26, 2022
What is single-blind peer review? How does it work? Who is involved in this type of peer review? This flowchart will give you some quick insights into how single-blind…
- Andrea Hayward
- September 11, 2018
What is double-blind peer review? How does it work? Who is involved in this type of peer review? This flowchart will provide you with a quick look at how double-blind…
- Andrea Hayward
- September 12, 2018