- Popular
Q: How can I re-write the RRL to RRS?
In casual parlance, review of the related literature (RRL) and review of related studies (RRS) might be used interchangeably; however, there is a subtle difference.
An RRL reviews as much of the literature possible around a particular research problem. This literature can include various article types, including theoretical articles, reviews, protocol papers, opinions, and policy statements.
An RRS is a review of all the studies around a particular research problem. An RRS helps justify the need for studying the problem in the first place. Studies involve actual experiments and/or data collection and analysis. Therefore, an RRS only includes empirical studies, experiments, and research findings.
To rewrite your RRL to an RRS, you will need to scrutinize the references and cull out any paper that is not based on experimental studies, e.g., theoretical articles, reviews, protocol papers, and gray literature. Retain papers based on experiments and research findings rather than opinions and review articles. Ensure that you have covered all the relevant experimental studies. If not, be sure to incorporate them into the revised text. After you remove/add these papers and their mention and discussion in your current manuscript, you will need to smoothen out the text and make new connections across sections and paragraphs so that the flow is not affected.
To re-write the Review of Related Literature (RRL) into a Review of Related Studies (RRS), focus on summarizing previous research studies instead of general literature. Highlight key findings, methodologies, and conclusions from scholarly articles or research papers. Organize the studies by themes or research questions and explain their relevance to your own research. Always cite the sources properly.
Score: solar smash online
To rewrite your Review of Related Literature (RRL) into a Review of Related Studies (RRS), focus on narrowing your sources to published research studies, experiments, and scholarly papers instead of general literature, theories, or conceptual discussions. Structure it by summarizing key findings, methodologies, and how those studies specifically relate to your research. Ensure you cite credible academic sources and highlight gaps or trends in existing research to justify your study’s significance. ragdoll hit
The opinions above are genuinely insightful and clearly outline the distinction between RRL and RRS. I'd like to add that when rewriting an RRL into an RRS, it's also helpful to group studies based on the specific variables or constructs they examine, this makes it easier to identify patterns and research gaps directly related to your own study. [color rush](https://colorrush.org)
This content belongs to the Conducting Research Stage