Q: In a manuscript, are the Discussion and Conclusion sections the same?

Detailed Question -

I just watched the Webinar on Structuring a Scientific Manuscript: Perspective of a Managing Editor, it was very enlightening and helpful, tho I am a little confused with the Discussion and Conclusion. The IMRaD ends with the Discussion but researches summarizes through a Conclusion. Which is which? Does this structure applied also to other reviewers and editor of other journals?

Asked on Jul 14, 2017
2 Answer to this question

Answer:

Indeed, a lot of studies do end with a separate Conclusion section. So, do authors not summarize their key takeaways towards of the Discussion? Is the conclusion to be considered a separate entity from IMRaD?

Well, the answer to that is it depends entirely on the requirements of your target journal. If your target journal requires you to provide a separate conclusions section, then you should present the key points of your study separately in this section. This would include a brief summary of your results and a couple of lines on the impact of your findings.

If, however, the journal asks you to only present a Discussion, followed by Acknowledgements, References etc., you should still be presenting a brief conclusion of your study (without a section heading of course!), which again should summarize your key findings and the implications of those findings.

I sincerely hope that this answers your questions. Please do not hesitate to get back to me should you have any further queries.

Answered by Editage Insights 21 Jul, 2017

Resources for authors and journals


Answer: Thank you very much, I am clarified.

Answered by IMELDA ANGELES 21 Jul, 2017