Get expert advice to help you get published!

You are here

PubPeer founders reveal themselves, announce a new non-profit foundation

Sneha Kulkarni | Sep 3, 2015 | 16,085 views
PubPeer founders reveal themselves, announce a new non-profit foundation

The identity of the founders of PubPeer, the popular and controversial post-publication peer review website, was until recently shrouded in mystery. In a post published on August 31, the founders unmasked themselves, announcing the reorganization of PubPeer as the non-profit PubPeer Foundation. The three-year old website was founded by Brandon Stell, a neuroscientist at the National Center for Scientific Research, Paris, along with Richard Smith and George Smith who preferred not to reveal their affiliations. Treasurer Boris Barbour and Secretary Gabor Brasnjo are also part of the foundation’s board.

According to the blog post, The PubPeer Foundation was registered in California in December 2014 and its goal was “to help improve the quality of scientific research by enabling innovative approaches for community interaction.” Stell launched the website anonymously in 2012 because, “If it was a disaster, I didn't want my name attached to it. I could also foresee, if it worked well, that people who were unhappy with comments on their papers could potentially put pressure on me to remove those comments.” The founders decided to break their anonymity because they wanted to “seek philanthropic funding to improve and expand the website,” and it would have been difficult to register a non-profit foundation without any names attached.

In an interview, Stell recalls that as an undergraduate in the University of Colorado, Boulder, he attended journal clubs where published papers were discussed and argued upon. These discussions inspired him to create a forum that could support deliberations on published research, leading ultimately to the launch of PubPeer.  

PubPeer has attracted wide attention from academia. Since its launch, the platform has garnered over 35,000 comments by users who can choose to post their comments anonymously. This option of invisible commenting attracted controversies, including a defamation suit by a researcher who claimed that anonymous derogatory comments posted on the website about his work cost him his job. Stell is, however, unfazed by such incidents. He said, “There will always be risks of lawsuits but hopefully we’ll see more people responding to critics with raw data instead of lawsuits.”

Stell believes that the establishment of The PubPeer Foundation will “help grow the community of post-publication peer reviewers and further encourage quality science.


Like this article? Republish it!
Knowledge should be open to all. We encourage our viewers to republish articles, online or in print. Our Creative Commons license allows you to do so for free. We only ask you to follow a few simple guidelines:
  • Attribution: Remember to attribute our authors. They spend a lot of time and effort in creating this content for you.
  • Editage Insights: Include an attribution to Editage Insights as the original source.
  • Consider a teaser: Yes, that’s what we call it…a teaser. You could include a few lines of this post and say “Read the whole article on Editage Insights”. Don’t forget to add the link to the article.
  • Re-using images: Re-publishing some of the images from our articles may need prior permission from or credit to the original image source.
  • Quick and easy embed code: The simplest way to share this article on your webpage would be to embed the code below.


Please copy the above code and embed it onto your website to republish.
Download free ebooks, guides and templates.
Editage Insights offers a wealth of free resources on academic research and publishing. Sign up and get complete access to a vibrant global community of 179k researchers.
By clicking 'Join Now', you agree to our Terms & Privacy Policy.
Having trouble registering/logging in? Contact us
Q & A

Have your own question?

Related Categories