Dr. Radhika Vaishnav

PhD, University of Kentucky, United States

A strong advocate of curiosity, creativity and cross-disciplinary conversations

The Role of the Peer Reviewer in an AI-Assisted Future

AI may bring in consistency but I would trust the human to maintain the trust in the peer review process. As part of the Peer Review Week 2026 event, we interviewed industry experts to understand their views on the AI-human partnership that is evolving in modern day peer review. Here, we present an interview of […]

AI in Peer Review – Where Does Its Role End?

AI should help editors spend less time on routine tasks and more time exercising the judgment that makes peer review valuable in the first place. As part of the Peer Review Week 2026, we feature the interview of Maryam Sayab, Executive Director, Communications & Global Engagement, Asian Council of Science Editors | Dubai | UAE, […]

Peer Review in the Age of AI – What Should Stay Human?

While AI will undoubtedly be able to assist in technical aspects of a review, humans are uniquely able to provide nuanced critique based on their wide-ranging experience on a topic. We interviewed Laura Dormer, Editor-in-Chief – Learned Publishing, The Association of Learned & Professional Society Publishers (ALPSP) as part of the Peer Review Week 2026 event. […]

What the End of NIH Paylines Means for Grant Writers

The National Institutes of Health have proposed changes to the way that grants are reviewed and scores are reported. With the end of paylines, is a good peer review score still enough to get funded? What should grant writers know before submitting the next grant? What do early career researchers, especially, need to be aware […]