Q: What can I do if my co-author submitted new data post-review without my consent?
I am the first author of a manuscript that was recently "accepted in principle".The submission, peer review, and revisions of this manuscript happened after I left the laboratory of the corresponding author where I was a postdoc. I was actively involved in the revisions. Following peer review and revisions, the corresponding author wanted to include new data which I did not approve of because I felt it was extraneous and confounding. In spite of my clear objection, he submitted this data without my consent. After multiple unsuccessful attempts at trying to resolve the issue with the corresponding author, I contacted the journal editor. She sent a rather timid email to the corresponding author saying that it was okay to add in data after peer review since manuscripts are not "frozen" after they are accepted in principle. She said she was willing to include this data if it strengthened the manuscript and asked the lead author to contact all co-authors and obtain their consent before the final submission.The lead author is still refusing to change his decision. He told me that he will easily get all other co-authors to consent to this. In which case, he said that it will appear that I am trying to suppress useful data. I feel bullied here since I cannot match up to his seniority and his relations with the co-authors. He has so far not provided any clear scientific reason for including this data. Any guesses on what decision the journal will take if both I and the corresponding author continue to disagree, and I am the only one not giving consent?
Most journals will not publish the article until all the co-authors have approved of this change. Even if one author does not approve, the paper should ideally not be published. However, I am wondering why the corresponding author wants to add new data at this stage? Have the peer reviewer comments mentioned that the paper could be stronger with this data?
You can write to the corresponding author asking how the scientific quality of the manuscript will be improved by the inclusion of this data. You can keep the other co-authors in cc and explain that you cannot give your consent unless you know the reason behind adding new data. If you are not convinced, explain why you do not agree with the decision, and why you feel adding the new data might harm the manuscript. Also explain that adding new data might mean that the manuscript will go for another round of peer review.
Send a copy of this correspondence to the journal editor, requesting that the paper not be published without your consent. Always be watchful and keep updated on all new articles in your field. If you see the paper published anywhere without your knowledge, you should contact the journal immediately.
- Basics of authorship in academic publishing
- How should a journal address an authorship dispute?
- Can I change the first author of my journal article after submission?