Editage Insights Editage Insights
Log In/Register Submit Enquiry
Editage Insights
  • Publication Success
    • Academic Editing Services
    • Publication Support Services
    • Translation Services
    • Statistical Analysis and Review Services
  • Research Journey
    • Conducting Research
      • Research Data Management
      • Publication Planning
    • Manuscript Writing
      • Academic Writing
      • Research Paper Structure
    • Journal Selection
      • Choosing a Journal
      • Publication Models
    • Journal Submission & Peer Review
      • Manuscript Submission
      • Tracking Your Submission
      • Journal Rejection
      • Journal Retraction
  • Career Growth
    • Securing Research Funding
      • Funding Sources
      • Grant Application
    • Science Communication
      • Public Engagement
      • Plain Language Summaries
      • Video & Graphical Abstracts
      • Promoting your Research
    • Professional Development
      • Collaboration and networking
      • Presentation skills
      • Project Management
    • Career Advancement
      • Becoming a Peer Reviewer
      • Career Advice for Researchers
  • Mental Health
    • Mental Health in Academia
      • Research Culture
      • Researcher Wellness
    • Stories by Researchers
  • Q & A
  • Training Resources
    • WEBINARS & WORKSHOPS
    • Downloadables
  • Industry Outlook
    • AI & Digital Transformation
    • Maximizing Impact
    • Research Integrity
    • Researcher Engagement
    • Trends in Scholarly Publishing
  • Submit Enquiry
  1. Home
  2. Planning to Write
  3. A quick guide…

A quick guide to conducting an effective review of related literature (RRL)

This article is in
  • Planning to Write

  • Malvika Gaur
  • Malvika Gaur

    Jan 6, 2023

Reading time
3 mins
 A quick guide to conducting an effective review of related literature (RRL)

A question that we often get asked is how to review related literature. However, before we discuss that let’s first understand what a review of related literature (RRL) is.

What’s an RRL?

Put simply, RRL is a thorough and in-depth analysis of existing literature related to the topic of your thesis or dissertation. In an RRL, you can include the concepts, methods, and results of the existing literature relevant to your topic; this will give you an overview of what has been done in your field of research, the methods adopted that lead to the conclusions mentioned in the existing literature, and if there is a gap or conflict in the existing literature. The gap or conflict is what you can address through your research question.

Is it worth spending all that time on a detailed literature review?

Yes! A detailed literature review has a three-fold purpose:

1. Enables you to showcase your understanding of the subject and the work done in your field till the time of your research. 

2. Helps you define the problem statement and the purpose of your own research by identifying and highlighting a gap or conflict in the existing literature.

3. Helps you set context for your research by summarizing everything that your readers—journal editors, referees, and other researchers—must know about your field of research to comprehend your work better.

Easy steps to doing an effective review of related literature

Before you begin the RRL

1. Decide how you wish to organize your review:

There are several approaches you may take to present your literature review. Through this table, you may understand the difference between two of the most used approaches and choose the best approach for your manuscript:

Chronological

Thematic

Related work is listed as per their dates of publication, beginning from the earliest one.

Related work is listed as per their themes or theoretical concepts.

Highlights the development in a field of study over a period.

Highlights the existing knowledge about a topic with reference to important issues/themes/perspectives.

Example: An RRL focussing on skin cancer will entail examining the earliest methods of diagnosis and treatment, and gradually progressing to the latest models and treatment.

Example: An RRL focussing on skin cancer will list studies about melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer, tanning as a cause of skin cancer, teenager awareness and attitudes to skin cancer, and treatment models.

 

 

2. Understand the difference between a study background and a literature review:
Understand how study background and literature review are different here: INFOGRAPHIC: 6 Differences between study background and literature review

3. Shortlist a good reference management software:
It is also recommended that you shortlist a good reference management software like Zotero to manage your bibliographic data and related research materials.

During the literature review process and at the writing stage

1. Identify relevant literature: The first and foremost step to conduct an RRL is to identify relevant literature. You can do this through various sources, online and offline. When going through the resources, make notes and identify key concepts of each resource to describe in the review. Discovering relevant work is highly important. Targeted search, following the citations of any relevant manuscript, and using a reference manager are some of the things to remember. You may look for other useful tips here: Tips for effective literature searching and keeping up with new publications

2. Structure your literature review well as you write it:

Similar to other components of a manuscript like the Introduction and Method sections, literature review is an important part of your manuscript. A literature review, especially if it is a stand-alone paper would usually have these components:

  • Introduction: You may begin your RRL by setting some context for your readers by providing information about the field of study, the relevance of the chosen topic within the field, and the focus of the literature review.
  • Methods: In this section, you may describe the criteria used to select the sources or the way in which the information has been presented. This makes it easier for the readers to understand your approach.
  • Body: This section is where you list all the related literature and talk about their relevance with respect to your research. The structure of the list depends entirely upon the approach you wish to take—chronological or thematic o any other. A chronological model would probably have different paragraphs for different time periods, while a thematic model would have sub-topics based on the different themes.
  • Discussion and conclusion: This section summarizes the main contributions of significant studies and discusses the questions that the review has raised about the topic and field. This is also the section where you highlight the gaps in research that the review has sparked and the possible suggestions for future research.
  • Reference list: The reference list is a very important part of a literature review as your article is based entirely on primary sources. The reference list should be comprehensive and page numbers and section details should be provided wherever necessary.

However, if the literature review is part of the manuscript, then the way it is structured will depend on journal requirements. It can be written as a single paragraph, but the paragraph can be structured to include the Introduction, Methods, etc. but without the actual sub-headings.

Conclusion

While a literature review can be published as an independent piece of writing or as part of a larger article, the basis for any kind of review of literature remains the same. It allows new researchers and busy scientists in the field to keep up to date with the latest happenings in the field and helps them to identify potential areas of research.

If you have any further doubts related to this topic, feel free to use the comments section to ask questions. Alternately, you can also post your question on our Q&A forum and our expert will be sure to provide the necessary guidance.

Author

Malvika Gaur

I enjoy writing and helping others communicate as part of Editage Insights - a community of researchers from around the world.

See more from Malvika Gaur

Found this useful?

If so, share it with your fellow researchers

View Comments

Related post

Navigating the maze of medical literature: A guide for early career researchers
Literature Search Planning to Write

Navigating the maze of medical literature: A...

May 24, 2023
A look at Sci-Hub’s current state and its impact on scholarly communication
Literature Search Open Access & Subscription Models

A look at Sci-Hub’s current state and...

May 11, 2023
What a journal editor expects to see in a literature review
Literature Search Study Background & Introduction

What a journal editor expects to see...

January 9, 2020

Related Reading

  • 5 Skills to become a self-reliant researcher in 2021

    5 Skills to become a self-reliant researcher in 2021
  • Experts speak: The missing piece of the researcher life puzzle

    What do researchers really need? Our team of global experts knows
  • Unprecedented times are here but make the most of it

    COVID-19 and online learning
  • Critical thinking: Definition and applications of critical thinking in research

  • How researchers should work to write the first draft of their manuscript

    How researchers should work to write the first draft of their article

About Editage Insights

Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more.

More

Quality

  • Confidentiality
  • Publication Ethics
  • Quality Assurance
  • Testimonials

Editage

  • About Editage
  • Payment Options
  • Prices for Editing
  • Terms of Use

More

  • Contribute as a Guest
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Contact Us

Publication Support Services

  • Artwork Preparation
  • Journal Selection
  • Journal Submission
  • Plagiarism Check
  • Publication Support Packs
  • Rapid Technical Review
  • Resubmission Support
  • Statistical Analysis and Review

Our Expertise

  • Business and Economics
  • Life Sciences
  • Medical Sciences
  • Physical Sciences
  • Social Sciences

FOLLOW ON SOCIAL PLATFORMS

Editage Insights Global Sites

Japanese – エディテージ・インサイト

Simplified Chinese – 意得辑专家视点

Korean - 에디티지 인사이트

Editing Services

  • Advanced Editing
  • Digital Editing
  • English Editing Services
  • Post-Editing Services
  • Premium Editing
  • Scientific Editing

Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent. English Editing - Editage.com | 英文校正 – Editage.jp | 원어민영문교정 – Editage.co.kr | SCI英文论文发表 – Editage.cn | publicação de artigos – Editage.com.br | 編輯英文 – Editage.com.tw

Copyright Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookies Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Careers

Filter by a topic

or Select all topics
x
  • Books & Tools
  • Career Growth
    • Career Advancement
      • Becoming a Peer Reviewer
      • Career Advice for Researchers
    • Professional Development
      • Collaboration and networking
      • Presentation skills
      • Project Management
    • Science Communication
      • Plain Language Summaries
      • Promoting your Research
      • Public Engagement
      • Video & Graphical Abstracts
    • Securing Research Funding
      • Funding Sources
      • Grant Application
  • Conducting Research
    • Publication Planning
      • Authorship in Research
      • Literature Search
      • Planning to Write
      • Research Ethics
      • Statement of the Problem
    • Research Data Management
      • Data Analysis
      • Data Storage & Management
  • Industry Outlook
    • AI & Digital Transformation
    • Maximizing Impact
    • Research Integrity
    • Researcher Engagement
    • Trends in Scholarly Publishing
  • Journal Selection
    • Choosing a Journal
      • Journal Selection Tips
      • Presubmission Inquiry
      • Understanding the Impact Factor
    • Publication Models
      • Avoiding Predatory Publishers
      • Open Access & Subscription Models
      • Rapid Publication
  • Journal Submission & Peer Review
    • Journal Rejection
      • Dealing with Rejection
      • Reasons for Rejection
    • Journal Retraction
      • Dealing with Retraction
      • Reasons for Retraction
    • Manuscript Submission
      • Duplicate Submission
      • Ethical Declarations
      • Submission Process
    • Responding to Peer Reviewers
      • Basics of Peer Review
      • Responding to Peer Reviewers
    • Tracking Your Submission
      • Manuscript Status
      • Manuscript Withdrawal
      • Queries to the Editor
  • Manuscript Writing
    • Academic Writing
      • Grammar & Language
      • Plagiarism in Research
      • Style & Format
    • Research Paper Structure
      • Methods
      • Publication Support Services
      • References & Acknowledgements
      • Results & Discussion
      • Study Background & Introduction
      • Tables & Figures
      • Title, Abstract & keywords
  • Mental Health
    • Mental Health in Academia
      • Research Culture
      • Researcher Wellness
  • More
    • News & Trends
      • COVID-19
      • Industry Interviews
      • Industry News
      • Industry Trends
      • Peer Review Week 2020
      • Trending Research
    • Recommended Reads
      • Around the web
      • Our Publication Showcase
      • Resources for Editors
  • Researchers and Their Stories
  • Showcasing Research Impact