Free personalized coaching

You are here

Author perspectives on the academic publishing process: initial observations from a large-scale global survey

Sneha Kulkarni | Jun 21, 2018 | 524 views
Author perspectives on the academic publishing process

Authors are at the heart of academic publishing, but their voices are underrepresented in discussions about improving the academic publishing system.

To understand the viewpoints of authors on various aspects of academic publishing and the challenges they face, the Editage Insights team developed a large-scale survey entitled “Author perspectives on the academic publishing process” and made it available in December 2016. The survey received 8,795 responses in total.

Based on the interim results drawn from 5,293 survey responses, the paper Authors’ perspectives on academic publishing: initial observations from a large-scale global survey published in Science Editing presents some interesting and thought-provoking trends that were observed in the authors’ responses, such as their interpretation of plagiarism and decisive factors in journal selection, as well as their thoughts on what needs to change in the publishing system for it to be more author-friendly.

Some of the most important findings of the survey are: the majority of the authors found manuscript preparation to be the most challenging task in the publication process, and the impact factor of a journal was reported to be the most important consideration for journal selection. The authors have noted several other critical findings in the paper.

Another fundamental aspect the survey tried to address is what changes authors wish in the publishing system. More than half of the participants indicated the areas for improvement in the current publishing system, indicating the necessity of making the journal publication process more author-centred.

Read the paper to find out the kind of changes authors hope to see in the current system.

This paper, published in Science Editing, has been reprinted with permission.   

Citation: Sci Ed 2018; 5(1): 39-43.


Like this article? Republish it!
Knowledge should be open to all. We encourage our viewers to republish articles, online or in print. Our Creative Commons license allows you to do so for free. We only ask you to follow a few simple guidelines:
  • Attribution: Remember to attribute our authors. They spend a lot of time and effort in creating this content for you.
  • Editage Insights: Include an attribution to Editage Insights as the original source.
  • Consider a teaser: Yes, that’s what we call it…a teaser. You could include a few lines of this post and say “Read the whole article on Editage Insights”. Don’t forget to add the link to the article.
  • Re-using images: Re-publishing some of the images from our articles may need prior permission from or credit to the original image source.
  • Quick and easy embed code: The simplest way to share this article on your webpage would be to embed the code below.


Please copy the above code and embed it onto your website to republish.
Download free ebooks, guides and templates.
Editage Insights offers a wealth of free resources on academic research and publishing. Sign up and get complete access to a vibrant global community of 179k researchers.
By clicking 'Join Now', you agree to our Terms & Privacy Policy.
Having trouble registering/logging in? Contact us
Q & A

Have your own question?

Related Categories