How to run an ANOVA: Best practices

This article is in

Reading time
3 mins
 How to run an ANOVA: Best practices

To make sure you’re running an ANOVA correctly, you must

  • Verify that the data meet the assumptions
  • Calculate effect size
  • Run post-hoc comparisons
  • Check for interactions between variables

Verify that the data meet the assumptions of an ANOVA

What are the assumptions of ANOVA?

Example:

Calculate effect size

Why calculate effect size?

Example:

Run post-hoc comparisons

What are post hoc comparisons?

Example:

Check for interaction between variables

What are interactions between variables?

Why include interactions in your ANOVA?

Example:

 

 

When you’ve got a bunch of different groups in your study, it can be tricky to know which test is the best for comparing differences between them. ANOVA is a powerful inferential statistical technique that allows us to compare means across multiple groups, providing valuable insights into experimental data. In this blog post, we’ll explore four key practices to maximize the potential of your ANOVAs.

Verify that the data meet the assumptions of an ANOVA

Before plunging into an ANOVA, it’s crucial to ensure that your data meet certain assumptions.

What are the assumptions of ANOVA?

  • Normality: The data within each group should be normally distributed.
  • Homogeneity of variance: The variance of the data within each group should be equal.
  • Independence: The observations within each group should be independent.
  • Random sampling: Observations within each group have been sampled randomly and are independent of each other.

Violations of these assumptions can impact the validity of your results.

Example:

Suppose you’re conducting a study investigating the effect of a new drug on blood pressure. You collect blood pressure measurements from three groups: control, low dosage, and high dosage. To verify normality, you could create histograms of the blood pressure measurements for each group and visually inspect their distributions. Additionally, tests like the Shapiro-Wilk test can provide quantitative evidence of normality.

Remember, assessing assumptions upfront will help you avoid potential pitfalls and increase the reliability of your ANOVA results.

Calculate effect size

While p-values are commonly used in hypothesis testing, they only tell us if an effect is statistically significant or not. Effect size measures, on the other hand, provide valuable information about the magnitude and practical significance of the observed effects.

Why calculate effect size?

By considering effect size measures, such as eta-squared, partial eta-squared, or omega-squared, you gain a deeper understanding of the practical significance of your findings, allowing you to communicate their importance more effectively.

 

Example:

Let’s say you’re studying the impact of different exercise programs on body mass index (BMI) in a sample of obese individuals. After performing an ANOVA, you find a significant difference among the exercise groups. To better understand the strength of this effect, you can calculate eta-squared, which represents the proportion of total variance explained by the group differences.

Run post-hoc comparisons

An ANOVA helps us determine if there are any differences among the groups, but it doesn’t tell us which specific groups differ from each other. That’s where post-hoc comparisons come into play.

What are post hoc comparisons?

Post hoc comparisons are exploratory tests that you run after your ANOVA shows a significant difference between 3 or more group means, so that you can tell which pairs of means significantly differ from each other.

Example:

Suppose you’re investigating the effect of different drug treatments on cell viability in a cancer cell line. ANOVA reveals a significant overall difference among the treatment groups. To pinpoint the specific pairwise differences, you can use post-hoc tests like Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) or Bonferroni correction. These tests provide adjusted p-values for multiple comparisons, helping you identify which treatment groups significantly differ from one another.

Why run post hoc comparisons after an ANOVA?

Post-hoc comparisons provide a more detailed picture of the relationships between the groups, enabling you to draw more specific conclusions from your ANOVA results.

Check for interaction between variables

What are interactions between variables?

Interactions occur when the effect of one variable on the outcome depends on the level of another variable.

Why include interactions in your ANOVA?

Including interactions in your ANOVA can reveal more complex relationships between factors. Identifying and interpreting interactions is essential for fully understanding the complexities of your data and drawing accurate conclusions about the factors influencing your outcome.

Example:

Suppose you’re examining the effect of a nutritional intervention on cholesterol levels among male and female participants. Your ANOVA detects a significant main effect of the nutritional intervention, but it’s crucial to investigate if there’s an interaction between the nutritional intervention and gender. By including an interaction term in the ANOVA model and examining its significance, you can determine whether the effect of the intervention differs depending on gender.

Need help in assessing the differences between groups in your study? Our expert biostatisticians can help you choose, run, and interpret the results of the right test. Check out Editage’s Statistical Analysis & Review Services

 

Author

Marisha Fonseca

An editor at heart and perfectionist by disposition, providing solutions for journals, publishers, and universities in areas like alt-text writing and publication consultancy.

See more from Marisha Fonseca

Found this useful?

If so, share it with your fellow researchers


Related post

Related Reading