This article highlights the dangers that paper mills pose and how well-meaning researchers can avoid their pitfalls.
- David Burbridge
- May 30, 2023
While one goal of peer review is verifying whether research data are plausible, there were never traditionally people who made a career out of investigating research data and processes to maintain…
- David Burbridge
- May 19, 2023
Have you heard of Sci-hub? This post looks at its history, what researchers think about it, and how does its future look like.
- David Burbridge
- May 11, 2023
This video features Dr Jacob Wickham explaining the concepts of nominal and ordinal scales of data. In just a few minutes, viewers can gain a better understanding of these…
- Sneha Kulkarni
- March 9, 2023
This video is the first of a 3-part interview series on what researchers need to know about communicating with policymakers. Marta Pulido, PhD (Communications Officer at IDIBAPS), talks about her…
- Mriganka Awati
- March 8, 2023
These are the key highlights of the report that The Chinese Association for Science and Technology (CAST) and The International Association of Scientific, Technical & Medical Publishers (STM)…
- David Burbridge
- February 16, 2023
Alessandro Checco is Assistant Professor at computer science department, University of Rome La Sapienza (https://alessandrochecco.github.io/). He’s a mathematical engineer and has a PhD in…
- Sneha Kulkarni
- November 1, 2022
Experts and KOLs from the scholarly publishing industry are voicing their opinions on climate…
- Editage Insights
- October 26, 2022
October 28, 2022, 14:00 PM - 15:00 PM UTC
As we celebrate Peer Review Week 2022, we ask experts to reflect on how celebrating Peer Review Week has created an impact in scholarly communications or academia.
- Mriganka Awati
- September 23, 2022