Get expert advice to help you get published!

You are here

Discrepancy between instructions on journal website and submission system: A case study

Kakoli Majumder | Sep 3, 2015 | 12,313 views
Instructions on the journal website were not matching with the instructions provided by the journal submission system

Case: An author had his paper edited by us and took the help of our publication support services for journal selection and submission. We selected a journal and ensured that the paper met all the requirements in the author guidelines section of the journal. However, when the author tried to submit the manuscript through the online submission system, the system did not accept the submission because the abstract did not meet the journal requirements. According to the instruction provided in the online submission system, the abstract should not exceed 200 words. However, the journal website’s guidelines for authors clearly mentioned that the abstract should be written within 300 words, which is what the author had followed. The author was confused as to which guideline he should follow and approached us for advice.

Action: We checked all the sections of the journal website, but did not find any other information about the length of the abstract. We advised the author to write to the journal Editor for clarification. The Editor replied that the word count mentioned in the online submission system was the correct one, and the change would be made in the website’s author guidelines shortly. The author shortened the abstract and managed to submit it successfully through the journal submission system.

Summary: The instructions for authors provided on the journal’s online submission system and the journal’s website may differ from each other if either of the two has not been updated. However, this can be confusing for authors as they would not be sure which instructions to follow. Additionally, this could delay the submission as the author might need to make last minute changes. Journals should be more sensitive towards authors and ensure that the submission process is smooth for them. The journal’s website should be promptly updated each time a change is implemented in the online submission system and vice versa.

Republish

Like this article? Republish it!
Knowledge should be open to all. We encourage our viewers to republish articles, online or in print. Our Creative Commons license allows you to do so for free. We only ask you to follow a few simple guidelines:
  • Attribution: Remember to attribute our authors. They spend a lot of time and effort in creating this content for you.
  • Editage Insights: Include an attribution to Editage Insights as the original source.
  • Consider a teaser: Yes, that’s what we call it…a teaser. You could include a few lines of this post and say “Read the whole article on Editage Insights”. Don’t forget to add the link to the article.
  • Re-using images: Re-publishing some of the images from our articles may need prior permission from or credit to the original image source.
  • Quick and easy embed code: The simplest way to share this article on your webpage would be to embed the code below.

 

Please copy the above code and embed it onto your website to republish.
Join a community of 179000+ researchers
Editage Insights offers a wealth of free resources on academic research and publishing. Sign up and get complete access to a vibrant global community of researchers. Gain expertise & share your own with authors and others involved in scholarly publishing.
By clicking 'Join Now', you agree to our Terms & Privacy Policy.
Having trouble registering/logging in? Contact us
Q & A

Have your own question?

Related Categories