Q: How can I respond to a reviewer comment about an error in the data?

Detailed Question -

I have received notification of moderate revision from a journal. In my submitted manuscript I had an error and presented a wrong value for a parameter that I calculated (In other words, my calculation was correct but I used a value from another time period; for example I stated 200 instead of say 400). I did not recognize the error until one of the reviewers highlighted it and asked how was the value so low. So I am wondering how do I proceed to answer to the reviewer comment. Would it create any doubts in the credibility of my submitted manuscript? In fact, the (value for the) parameter was not needed or used anywhere in the manuscript and was just referenced to show the environmental conditions. It can thus be deleted, which i am/was planning to do in the revision, but I am now wondering if it would impose some doubt if I proceed to delete it. Guidelines on how to respond will be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

1 Answer to this question
Answer:

In my opinion, deleting the value for the parameter might give the impression that you had intentionally manipulated the data, and deleted it when questioned. Since the reviewer has pointed out the error, you should reply to his/her comment. I think it's best to be honest and admit that it was an error, and you used the value of the previous parameter by mistake. You can also mention what the correct value would be or say that since it is not very important, it can be deleted. Whatever you do, you should be transparent and make sure you address every single comment that the reviewers have made.

Related reading: