Q: In which order should we include variables while writing the background of a study?
Should we begin with dv or iv while writing the background of a study?
It is not uncommon for a manuscript to be sent for two rounds of peer review before the editor can arrive at a decision. This usually happens if the reviewer comments from the first round of peer review are weak or conflicting. In such cases, the editor generally sends the paper out for an additional review. So I don't think you have anything to worry about. The manuscript is making steady progress, and hopefully, you will receive a decision soon. Good luck!
Related reading:
- What does a change from "Under review" to "Reviewer request completed" and back to "Under review" mean?
- What does a status change from "under review" to "under editor evaluation" and back to "under review" mean?
- Why does the status change back to "Reviewers assigned" after 3 days of "Under review"?
- What does a change from "awaiting editorial decision" back to "under review" mean?
This content belongs to the Manuscript Writing Stage
Translate your research into a publication-worthy manuscript by understanding the nuances of academic writing. Subscribe and get curated reads that will help you write an excellent manuscript.