Ask a question


You are here

Is reviewers' demand for more experiments justified?

Sneha Kulkarni | Oct 31, 2014 | 42,893 views
Is reviewers' demand for more experiments justified?

It takes several months to years for a researcher to publish a paper. A commonly cited reason for delayed publication is that the peer reviewers often recommend that additional experiments be performed. While reviewer-suggested experiments might be intended to ensure that authors’ claims are supported by substantial evidence, such requests lead to a prolonged peer review process. This not only keeps good science away from the public but also increases the cost of labs since additional experiments need to be conducted. Do reviewer-suggested experiments really help in improving the research data or are the suggestions made indiscriminately? Can journal editors play a role in ensuring that peer review is conducted responsibly? Read the article that discusses these issues in depth.

This content is available exclusively to Editage Insights members.
To continue reading, sign up for free and join over
169,000 Editage members.

Free unlimited access
  • Premium content
  • Q&A Forum
  • Personalized reading library
  • Members-only discounts and much more