How to analyze longitudinal data appropriately: Tips for biomedical researchers


Reading time
4 mins
 How to analyze longitudinal data appropriately: Tips for biomedical researchers

What is a longitudinal study?

Longitudinal studies involve the collection of data from the same subjects at multiple time points. These studies play a critical role in understanding the dynamics of health and disease over time. To ensure the validity and reliability of your findings, it’s essential to take specific precautions during statistical analysis.

Which are the best statistical tests for longitudinal data?

The table below summarizes popular statistical tests that are used in longitudinal biomedical research.

Test/model Outcome type Example Advantages Limitations Best for
Linear mixed-effects model (LMM) Continuous Tracking HbA1c levels every 3 months in a type 2 diabetes cohort with dropout
  • Handles unbalanced / missing data under MAR
  • Accounts for within-subject correlation
  • Allows time-varying covariates
  • Models individual random trajectories
  • Assumes normality of residuals
  • Misspecified random effects can bias estimates
Repeated measures with random individual trajectories
Repeated measures ANOVA (RM-ANOVA) Continuous Comparing FEV₁ at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months across three treatment arms in a balanced asthma trial
  • Simple to run and interpret
  • Widely understood by clinicians and reviewers
  • Requires complete cases — listwise deletion biases results
  • Sphericity assumption often violated
  • Poor with many time points
Small, balanced designs with few time points
Growth curve model (GCM) Continuous Modelling individual cognitive decline trajectories (e.g. MMSE score) over 10 years in an Alzheimer’s cohort
  • Captures nonlinear and heterogeneous growth
  • Separates within- and between-person variance
  • Can test predictors of trajectory shape
  • Requires adequate sample size
  • Complex specification
  • Interpretation less intuitive than regression
Modelling individual trajectories over time
Generalised estimating equations (GEE) Continuous
Binary
Count
Estimating the population-average effect of a statin on systolic blood pressure across clinic visits in a cardiology registry
  • Robust to misspecification of correlation structure
  • Population-level inference
  • Flexible across outcome types
  • Less efficient than LMM when model is correct
  • Requires MAR
  • No subject-specific inference
Population-average effects in cohort studies
GLMM — logistic (random-effects logistic) Binary Assessing whether HIV-positive patients achieve viral suppression (<200 copies/mL) at quarterly visits over 2 years of ART
  • Subject-specific odds ratios
  • Handles missing data under MAR
  • Flexible covariance structures
  • Computationally intensive
  • OR scale can be hard to communicate
  • Requires large n for stable estimates
Binary outcomes with repeated measures
McNemar’s test Binary Testing whether depression screening status (positive/negative on PHQ-9) changes from pre- to post-intervention in a paired sample
  • Simple and well-suited to paired pre/post designs
  • No distributional assumptions
  • Only two time points
  • No covariates
  • Does not generalise to >2 measurements
Two matched time points only
Marginal structural model (MSM) Binary
Continuous
Estimating the causal effect of time-varying corticosteroid use on bone mineral density in a lupus cohort, where disease activity confounds both treatment and outcome
  • Adjusts for time-varying confounders affected by prior treatment (via IPTW)
  • Estimates causal, not merely associational, effects
  • Sensitive to weight model misspecification
  • Extreme weights inflate variance
  • Requires no unmeasured confounding
Causal inference with time-varying confounding
Negative binomial mixed model Count Modelling number of COPD exacerbations per quarter per patient over a 2-year follow-up, with high between-patient variability
  • Handles over-dispersion better than Poisson
  • Subject-level random effects
  • Suitable for skewed count distributions
  • More parameters to estimate
  • Zero-inflated data may need additional modelling
Over-dispersed repeated count outcomes
Poisson mixed model Count Counting seizure episodes per month in an epilepsy drug trial with an exposure offset for days at risk
  • Natural model for rates and counts
  • Includes exposure offset
  • Interpretable incidence rate ratios
  • Assumes mean = variance
  • Under-fits over-dispersed data
  • Can produce biased SEs if dispersion ignored
Repeated count data with modest dispersion
Cox proportional hazards model Time-to-event Time from cancer diagnosis to first recurrence in a breast cancer surgery trial, adjusting for age, stage, and receptor status
  • Semi-parametric — no distributional assumption for baseline hazard
  • Handles censoring naturally
  • Widely used and understood
  • Proportional hazards assumption must hold
  • Cannot easily model recurrent events
  • Struggles with time-varying hazard shapes
Time to a single event (death, relapse, first hospitalisation)
Frailty model (random-effects Cox) Time-to-event Modelling recurrent UTI episodes in elderly care-home residents, accounting for unmeasured individual susceptibility
  • Accounts for unmeasured between-subject variability
  • Extends Cox model to recurrent events
  • Appropriate for clustered survival data
  • Frailty distribution assumption required
  • Interpretation of frailty term not always straightforward
Clustered or recurrent event data
Competing risks model (Fine–Gray) Time-to-event Estimating cumulative incidence of graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplant, where non-relapse mortality is a competing event
  • Models cumulative incidence directly
  • Avoids overestimation of event probability when competing risks exist
  • Subdistribution hazard less interpretable than cause-specific hazard
  • Assumes independent censoring
Outcomes where other events preclude the primary event
Multi-state model Time-to-event Mapping transitions between remission, relapse, and death in a multiple sclerosis cohort over 15 years
  • Models all transitions simultaneously
  • Captures full disease course including reversible states
  • Can estimate transition probabilities and sojourn times
  • High complexity
  • Requires large sample for stable transition rate estimates
  • Markov assumption often required
Complex disease trajectories with multiple states
Interrupted time series (ITS) analysis Continuous
Count
Evaluating the impact of a national antibiotic prescribing guideline on monthly prescription rates across GP practices before and after implementation
  • Quasi-experimental — controls for pre-existing trend
  • Useful with aggregate or routinely collected data
  • Can detect both level and slope changes
  • Requires sufficient pre- and post-intervention time points
  • Autocorrelation must be modelled
  • Assumes no other contemporaneous changes
Population-level impact of an intervention at a known time point
Latent class growth analysis (LCGA) Continuous Identifying distinct pain trajectory subgroups (e.g. persistent, resolving, delayed-onset) in a post-surgical recovery cohort
  • Uncovers heterogeneous subpopulations
  • No assumption of a single trajectory for all participants
  • Can associate class membership with predictors
  • Class number selection is subjective
  • Classes are probabilistic, not deterministic
  • Requires large n for stability
Identifying distinct subgroups with different longitudinal trajectories

 

How to analyze longitudinal data?

Here are 10 key precautions for biomedical researchers conducting longitudinal studies:

Data Quality Control

Implement rigorous data quality control measures to address issues like missing data, outliers, and inconsistencies. Data cleaning is crucial for maintaining data integrity.

Select Appropriate Statistical Techniques

Choose statistical methods that are suitable for longitudinal data, such as mixed-effects models, generalized estimating equations, or growth curve models. Using the wrong methods can lead to biased results.

Longitudinal Data Structures

Recognize the different data structures in longitudinal studies, such as unbalanced, balanced, or irregularly spaced data. Your analysis plan should accommodate these structures.

Account for Time

Time is a critical factor in longitudinal studies. Consider time as a covariate, and assess time trends and patterns within your data. This allows you to explore how outcomes change over time.

Handling Missing Data

Develop a strategy for handling missing data, whether through imputation or other techniques. Be transparent about your approach in your research report to ensure reproducibility.

Multiple Comparisons

Be cautious about multiple comparisons. Adjust significance levels or use methods like the Bonferroni correction to account for the increased risk of Type I errors when analyzing data at multiple time points.

Control for Confounders

Identify potential confounding variables that may influence your results. Include these in your models to ensure the validity of your findings.

Explore Interactions

Investigate interactions between variables, especially the interaction between predictors and time. This can reveal how the relationships change over the course of the study.

Model Assumptions

Check the assumptions of the chosen statistical models, such as linearity, independence, and homoscedasticity. Violations of these assumptions can affect the validity of your results.

Robustness Checks

Conduct sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of your findings. This involves testing different models or approaches to ensure the consistency of results.

Data Visualization

Use data visualization techniques to explore your data before, during, and after analysis. This helps identify trends, outliers, and potential issues that may require further investigation.

Transparent Reporting

Document your analytical procedures thoroughly and report all relevant details in your research papers. Transparency is crucial for reproducibility and peer review.

Looking for a trusty collaborator to help you design a longitudinal study and analyze the data? Check out Editage’s Statistical Analysis & Review Services.

 

Author

Marisha Fonseca

An editor at heart and perfectionist by disposition, providing solutions for journals, publishers, and universities in areas like alt-text writing and publication consultancy.

See more from Marisha Fonseca

Found this useful?

If so, share it with your fellow researchers


Related post

Related Reading