Skip to main content

COVID-19 Log In/Register

Ask a Question

Mega Nav

Join the

Training Academy
Get Published
Career Growth
Mental Health
Cactus Foundation Mental Health Survey

Joy and Stress Triggers

A global survey on mental health among researchers

Take the Survey
- Mental Health in Academia
- Stories by Researchers
Q&A
Researchers & Their Stories
More
Recent Webinar

26 March 2020

Overcome all barriers in your academic, personal, and professional journey

View Details
- workshop
- Trends
Covid-19

Researcher Q&A

Get all your questions on research writing and publishing answered by researchers and publication experts!

Top Q&A Topics

Manuscript Status

Planning to Write

Submission Process

Journal Selection Tips

Study Background & Introduction

Statement of the Problem

Research Ethics

Authorship in Research

Title, Abstract & keywords

Queries to the Editor

Other Content Types

Infographics & Downloadables

Courses & Handbooks

Webinars & Workshops

Hi ,

What is your academic question today?

Reasons for Rejection

Filter by a different topic

Latest

Q: How can I address the journal's comment on the originality of my paper?

Detailed question-I received a reply on originality from the journal, how shall I respond and what I should do next?Although I appreciate the scientific efforts represented by this work,…

Asked on April 22, 2019

1 Answer

The response letter from the journal indicates that your paper was rejected since the automated plagiarism check at the journal end detected a high percentage of…

Follow this Question

Q: Is it ethical for a reviewer to recommend adding a co-author to a manuscript?

Detailed question-Question description: Upon being reviewed by an Elsevier journal, the manuscript received the following comments:The first reviewer has recommended acceptance after…

Asked by Nusret Nurlu on September 17, 2018

1 Answer

This is indeed an interesting recommendation by the reviewer. Adding the geochemist and geochronologist as co-authors would mean that they…

Follow this Question

Q: My paper was rejected even though the reviews were favorable. What are my options?

Detailed question-It is very surprising that we had a manuscript rejected based on priority issues despite the fact that reviewers' comments are very positive with one of them declaring…

Asked by Ahmed Bendary on August 9, 2018

1 Answer

I agree with you that rejection due to issues with publication priority should ideally be done at the initial…

Follow this Question

Q: Can a short peer review process indicate manuscript rejection?

Detailed question-I had submitted a manuscript to a journal. First day, it showed "With editor," then after one day, it showed "Under review." After that, within one day it…

Asked by Misty Das on March 24, 2018

1 Answer

If the status changed to "Ready for Decision" within a day, it is indeed an unusually quick review. Even rapid…

Follow this Question

Q: Why do journals take too long to decide whether the research is appropriate and convey rejection?

Detailed question-I submitted a manuscript on 25th March 2017 to a journal indexed in Web of Science and it has an impact factor. Since May 2017, the status of my manuscript was reviewers…

Asked by Rasha Ahmed on March 3, 2018

1 Answer

Most of the journals take up to four weeks for the peer review process. This time varies across different journals…

Follow this Question

Q: Will my paper be rejected if I cannot suggest peer reviewers?

Detailed question-The structure of the cover letter of my journal demands a list of the colleagues who have checked my article. But I don't have any such colleagues.

Asked by Alexsandr Shcheblykin on December 12, 2017

4 Answers

Follow this Question

Q: What to do if your manuscript is rejected on the grounds that it is not appropriate?

Detailed question-I submitted a manuscript to the International Journal of Managerial Finance and after assigning it to an editor, the decision is that it cannot be published because it…

Asked by Emmanuel Konadu-Yiadom on September 12, 2017

3 Answers

Mostly it happens if the submitted manuscript does not match with the Scope of the journal. Also sometimes if the manuscript does not contain sufficient research work or…

Follow this Question

Q: My manuscript got rejected due to poor English. What should I do?

Detailed question-My manuscript got rejected at second stage of review. The Editor and Reviewer commented that my manuscript is written in VERY BAD ENGLISH and is full of GRAMMATICAL…

Asked by Krishna Kishore on August 24, 2017

1 Answer

I understand that it must be upsetting to receive rejection in the second round of review. It is very common for English as a second…

Follow this Question

Q: Is it justified to reject a manuscript because the editor was unable to obtain referees?

Detailed question-Dear all, I would like to describe my situation about manuscript submission. I submitted my manuscript to a journal on 27th June and received a decision letter on 12th…

Asked by Urska Sivka on July 26, 2017

1 Answer

As the editor has mentioned, this was clearly a mistake on their part, and the decision given earlier was incorrect. It's difficult to…

Follow this Question

Q: Does my rejection letter suggest that I will get a second chance?

Detailed question-Yesterday, I got an email from the journal editor. It states that my paper has been rejected: "After careful consideration in the editorial board, we regret to inform…

Asked by Suci Dwijayanti on June 20, 2017

1 Answer

This is a case of rejection with a request to revise and resubmit as a new submission. This kind of rejection is becoming increasingly…

Follow this Question

Pagination

Current page 1
Page 2
Next page
Last page

Filter by a topic

or

Select all topics

Mental Health
Mental Health in Academia
Research Culture
Researcher Wellness

Conducting Research
Research Data Management
Data Storage & Management
Data Analysis
Publication Planning
Authorship in Research
Literature Search
Statement of the Problem
Planning to Write
Research Ethics

Manuscript Writing
Academic Writing
Grammar & Language
Style & Format
Plagiarism in Research
Research Paper Structure
Title, Abstract & keywords
Study Background & Introduction
Methods
Results & Discussion
Tables & Figures
References & Acknowledgements
Publication Support Services

Journal Selection
Choosing a Journal
Journal Selection Tips
Understanding the Impact Factor
Presubmission Inquiry
Publication Models
Open Access & Subscription Models
Rapid Publication
Avoiding Predatory Publishers

Journal Submission & Peer Review
Manuscript Submission
Submission Process
Ethical Declarations
Duplicate Submission
Tracking Your Submission
Manuscript Status
Queries to the Editor
Manuscript Withdrawal
Responding to Peer Reviewers
Basics of Peer Review
Responding to Peer Reviewers
Journal Rejection
Reasons for Rejection
Dealing with Rejection
Journal Retraction
Reasons for Retraction
Dealing with Retraction

Career Growth
Securing Research Funding
Funding Sources
Grant Application
Science Communication
Public Engagement
Plain Language Summaries
Video & Graphical Abstracts
Promoting your Research
Professional Development
Project Management
Presentation skills
Collaboration and networking
Career Advancement
Becoming a Peer Reviewer
Career Advice for Researchers

More
News & Trends
Industry Interviews
Industry News
Industry Trends
Trending Research
COVID-19
Recommended Reads
Around the web
Our Publication Showcase
Resources for Editors

Help authors by answering these questions

Relevance to clinical practice

After "With Editor" status, my initial submission went back to being "Submitted to Journal" and then went back "With Editor"

My case study is about: In Europe, taxes in focus for tech giants

View all unanswered Q&As

View Forum Guidelines

About Editage Insights

Editage Insights offers a wealth of free academic research and publishing resources and is a one-stop guide for authors and others involved in scholarly publishing. Our original resources for authors and journals will help you become an expert in academic publishing. Register for comprehensive research tips and expert advice on English writing, journal publishing, good publication practices, trends in publishing, and a lot more.

Become a Member

Contribute as a Guest

Our Terms of Use

Subscribe

Read Editage Insights in your favorite RSS Reader.

Follow us on social platforms

Editage Insights Global Sites

Japanese – エディテージ・インサイト

Simplified Chinese – 意得辑专家视点

Korean - 에디티지 인사이트

Editage

About Editage
Contact Editage
News
Payment Options
Prices for Editing
Terms of Use

Publication Support Services

Artwork Preparation
Journal Selection
Journal Submission
Plagiarism Check
Publication Support Packs
Rapid Technical Review
Resubmission Support

Quality

Confidentiality
Delivery Guarantee
Publication Ethics
Quality Assurance
Testimonials

Editing Services

Advanced Editing
English Editing Services
Post-Editing Services
Premium Editing Plus
Premium Editing

Our Expertise

Business and Economics
Life Sciences
Medical Sciences
Physical Sciences
Social Sciences

Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Editage Insights is funded by Editage and endorses services provided by Editage but is editorially independent.

English Editing - Editage.com | 英文校正 – Editage.jp | 원어민영문교정 – Editage.co.kr | SCI英文论文发表 – Editage.cn | publicação de artigos – Editage.com.br | 編輯英文 – Editage.com.tw | Terms of Use for English Editing Services

2002— Cactus Communications. All Rights Reserved.

Icons made by various authors from www.flaticon.com

Trending Searches

Statement of the problem
COVID-19
Background of study
Scope of the study
Types of qualitative research
Rationale of the study
Concept paper
Literature review
Introduction in research
Under "Editor Evaluation"
Ethics in research

See more

See less

Recent Searches

Review paper
Responding to reviewer comments
Predatory publishers
Scope and delimitations
Open access
Plagiarism in research
Journal selection tips
Editor assigned
Types of articles
"Reject and Resubmit" status
Decision in process
Conflict of interest

See more

See less

Recommended Courses

Training Academy

Recommended Courses

Journal Publication

Dr. Sabyasachi Sengupta

approx. 10 min each

Career development

Become a great peer reviewer! (Basic and…

Dr. Jonas Ranstam + 2

approx. 36 min each