Q: What will happen if I can't address additional reviewer comments sent after my manuscript is accepted?
I submitted an original article and was recommended major revision. After revising the manuscript as per the reviewer’s comments within the defined time frame, I got an approval. I have finished a minor revision as per the editor’s comment, and also finished the proofing, and just waiting for the article to be published. A certificate for publishing was issued by the publisher, and I was informed that they were preparing for publication. However, some additional comments from the reviewers were suddenly sent and I am required to make considerable revision which is equivalent to a major revision. Some comments are difficult to deal with. If I cannot take action for these comments, would the decision to accept be revoked? To confirm whether these revisions are actually necessary or not, what kind of letter should I send to the publisher? I am confused as I haven't heard of such a case before.
I'm sorry to know about this unfortunate and rather exceptional case where the comments from one reviewer might have come late and the editor decided to convey the recommendations to the author after the manuscript was accepted for publication.
Considering you have already spent substantial time and effort in revising the manuscript, you may write to the editor politely explaining your situation and your opinion about the new comments. If you think the new comments are not essential for your manuscript, please explain so with adequate scientific reasonings in a point-by-point manner.
You may also request the editor to re-consider the decision of further major revision. The editor would then likely re-assess both the new comments and your responses before deciding whether to proceed with publishing or recommending revisions for the manuscript.
Related reading:
This content belongs to the Journal submission & peer review Stage