Q: Why is the re-review time unusually long for my paper?

I submitted a manuscript to Elsevier journal on Jan. 19. I received reviewers' comments on Feb. 15. The reviewers' comments are: Reviewer 1 appreciated the work and said that  it is of potential interest for many useers.He had only a few very minor comments, which could be even addressed at the proofreading stage: one suggested adding a reference, the second required splitting a table, and the last one asked to make a database in our work available for public. Reviewer 2 pointed out a few errors and asked me to explain some unclear areas in the work, and asked me to change a caption of a figure and to make the database available as the first reviewer had.

Although I think the comments imply minor correction to the manuscript, the decision of the editor was major correction and revise within 6 weeks. I revised the manuscript addressing all comments and resubmit by the end of 4 weeks, on March 14. While I was expecting receiving of approval shortly, the manuscript stayed "with editor" for longer than the first review time. I wrote to the editor asking about the status and after one hour the status changed to "under review". Given that the average time taken between revised and accepted is 13 days for this journal and my case now already exceeded 45 days, will the manuscript be likely rejected?